Volkswagen Scirocco III
Car comparison
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSIvsVolvo C30 · Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo C30 · Facelift 2010
2.5 T5 20V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Lightest1,298 kg2,862 lb
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range743 km462 mi
- Largest trunk312 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,298kg2,862lb | 1,519kg3,349lb |
| Gross weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 87.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.0s Calculated | 30.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 743km462mi Calculated | 689km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,256mm168in | 4,266mm168in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,782mm70in |
| Height | 1,404mm55in | 1,447mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,531mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 312L | 278L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,006L | 921L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 211g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.0 s | 30.7 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 97 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 230 hp 172 kW |
Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V has 20 hp more than Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI and Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 1,298 kg 2,862 lb |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 1,519 kg 3,349 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 6.9 s |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 7.1 s |
Although Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V has more power, Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI and Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI and Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 743 km 462 mi |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 689 km 428 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW | 6.9 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.1 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,298 kg 2,862 lb | 1,519 kg 3,349 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 743 km 462 mi | 689 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 211 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 312 L 11.0 cu ft | 278 L 9.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI | Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI
- Is 221 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 54 km (34 mi) more estimated range
- Has 34 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























