Volkswagen Scirocco III · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
Volkswagen Scirocco III · Facelift 2014 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagen Tayron X 330TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tayron X
330TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lightest1,375 kg3,031 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Best performance score45/100
- Best economy score95/100
Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI
- Most powerful186 hp139 kW
- Best power-to-weight111 hp/t83 kW/t9.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk525 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | VolkswagenTayron X330TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 186hp139kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,375kg3,031lb | 1,675kg3,693lb |
| Gross weight | 1,780kg3,924lb | - |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 96.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 107.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 49.5s Calculated | 54.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,310km814mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,256mm168in | 4,626mm182in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,406mm55in | 1,662mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | - |
| Trunk volume | 312L | 525L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,006L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 109g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 4,100-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | VolkswagenTayron X330TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 49.5 s | 54.0 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 186 hp 139 kW |
Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI has 36 hp more than Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI: 36 hp (27 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 8.6 s |
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 8.7 s |
Although Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI has more power, Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 186 hp 139 kW | 8.7 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | VolkswagenTayron X330TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 186 hp 139 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,310 km 814 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 109 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 312 L 11.0 cu ft | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI | Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.35 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,103 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 300 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Tayron X 330TSI
- Has 36 hp more
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 213 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























