Volkswagen Scirocco III · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
Volkswagen Scirocco III · Facelift 2014 2.0 TDIvsBMW 2 Series Coupe (F22) 218d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 2 Series Coupe (F22)
218d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lightest1,375 kg3,031 lb
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions109 g/km
- Best estimated range1,310 km814 mi
- Best overall score47/100
- Best performance score45/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score51/100
BMW 2 Series Coupe (F22) 218d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Largest trunk390 L
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | BMW2 Series Coupe (F22)218d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,375kg3,031lb | 1,375kg3,031lb |
| Gross weight | 1,780kg3,924lb | 1,885kg4,156lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 90.1s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 49.5s Calculated | 49.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,310km814mi Calculated | 1,182km734mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,256mm168in | 4,432mm174in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,774mm70in |
| Height | 1,406mm55in | 1,418mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,521mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,556mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 312L | 390L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,006L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | 109g/km | 116g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- BMW 2 Series Coupe (F22) 218d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMW2 Series Coupe (F22)218d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | BMW2 Series Coupe (F22)218d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 49.5 s | 49.6 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| BMW2 Series Coupe (F22)218d | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| BMW2 Series Coupe (F22)218d | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
| BMW2 Series Coupe (F22)218d | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| BMW2 Series Coupe (F22)218d | 213 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 8.6 s |
| BMW2 Series Coupe (F22)218d | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 2 Series Coupe (F22) 218d and Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| BMW2 Series Coupe (F22)218d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| BMW2 Series Coupe (F22)218d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 1,310 km 814 mi |
| BMW2 Series Coupe (F22)218d | 1,182 km 734 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| BMW2 Series Coupe (F22)218d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.4 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW2 Series Coupe (F22)218d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW2 Series Coupe (F22)218d |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| BMW2 Series Coupe (F22)218d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| BMW2 Series Coupe (F22)218d | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI | BMW2 Series Coupe (F22)218d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,310 km 814 mi | 1,182 km 734 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 109 g/km | 116 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 312 L 11.0 cu ft | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI | BMW 2 Series Coupe (F22) 218d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.35 LC100 km | 7.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,103 LC/year | 1,155 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Scirocco III Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 128 km (79 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 7 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
BMW 2 Series Coupe (F22) 218d
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 78 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























