Volvo S40 II
Car comparison
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5vsVolkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Jetta V
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range688 km427 mi
- Largest trunk527 L
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,486 kg3,276 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,486kg3,276lb | 1,526kg3,364lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 65.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.9s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 574km357mi Calculated | 688km427mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,468mm176in | 4,554mm179in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,781mm70in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,459mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,534mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,512mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 404L | 527L |
| Max trunk volume | 883L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 241g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.9 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5 has 20 hp more than Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI and Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 7.5 s |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 7.2 s |
Although Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5 has more power, Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI and Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI and Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 574 km 357 mi |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 688 km 427 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.2 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS40 II2.5 T5 | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 574 km 357 mi | 688 km 427 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 241 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | 527 L 18.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5 | Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S40 II 2.5 T5
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 113 km (70 mi) more estimated range
- Has 123 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























