Volkswagen Eos
Car comparison
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6vsVolvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo C30
2.5 i 20V T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Lightest1,422 kg3,135 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range713 km443 mi
- Largest trunk233 L
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t122 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score59/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,591kg3,508lb | 1,422kg3,135lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 99.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 90.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.7s Calculated | 26.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 598km371mi Calculated | 713km443mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,597cc220cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,407mm174in | 4,252mm167in |
| Width | 1,791mm71in | 1,782mm70in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,447mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,553mm61in | 1,531mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 106mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 183L | 233L |
| Max trunk volume | 358L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 208g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: Power / Torque
- Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,400-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.7 s | 26.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 230 hp 172 kW |
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 has 30 hp more than Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 and Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 1,591 kg 3,508 lb |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 1,422 kg 3,135 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 6.9 s |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 6.7 s |
Although Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 has more power, Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 and Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 and Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 598 km 371 mi |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 713 km 443 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | VolvoC302.5 i 20V T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,591 kg 3,508 lb | 1,422 kg 3,135 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 598 km 371 mi | 713 km 443 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 208 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 183 L 6.5 cu ft | 233 L 8.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 | Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 15.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,284 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volvo C30 2.5 i 20V T5
- Is 169 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 115 km (71 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























