Car comparison

Volkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010 2.0 TSIvsVolvo C30 · Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010

2.0 TSI

210 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2010-2015
VS

Volvo C30 · Facelift 2010

2.5 T5 20V

230 hp2521 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2010-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Most powerful
    230 hp
    172 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,519 kg
    3,349 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    151 hp/t
    113 kW/t
    6.6 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    278 L
  • Best overall score
    53/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best practicality score
    50/100

Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    238 km/h
    148 mph
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.6 L/100 km
    24.5 mpg US
    29.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    165 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    775 km
    481 mi
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIVolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
Power
210hp157kW
230hp172kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,563kg3,446lb
1,519kg3,349lb
Gross weight
2,000kg4,409lb
1,860kg4,101lb
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
101.1s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
87.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.1s
0-200 km/h
33.5s
Calculated
30.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton
Calculated
211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
775km481mi
Calculated
689km428mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
2,521cc154cu in
Length
4,423mm174in
4,266mm168in
Width
1,791mm71in
1,782mm70in
Height
1,444mm57in
1,447mm57in
Wheelbase
2,578mm101in
2,640mm104in
Front track
1,545mm61in
1,535mm60in
Rear track
1,547mm61in
1,531mm60in
Trunk volume
205L
278L
Max trunk volume-
921L
Doors
2
3
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
55L
62L
CO2 emissions
165g/km
211g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSIVolvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20VPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI5,300-6,200 rpm1,700-5,200 rpm6,450 rpm
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V5,000 rpm1,500-5,000 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIVolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.5 s
30.7 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
152 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
230 hp
172 kW

Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V has 20 hp more than Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI and Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
1,563 kg
3,446 lb
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
1,519 kg
3,349 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
238 km/h
148 mph
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI7.8 s
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V7.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V and Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI and Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V: 1.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
775 km
481 mi
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
689 km
428 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
210 hp
157 kW
7.8 s
238 km/h
148 mph
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
230 hp
172 kW
7.1 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,423 mm
174.1 in
Height
1,444 mm
56.9 in
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
278 L
9.8 cu ft
Length
4,266 mm
168.0 in
Height
1,447 mm
57.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK

Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
7.8 s
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
7.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIVolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V
Power
210 hp
157 kW
230 hp
172 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.1 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,563 kg
3,446 lb
1,519 kg
3,349 lb
Fuel consumption
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
9.0 L/100 km
26.1 mpg US
31.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,423 mm
174.1 in
Height
1,444 mm
56.9 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
278 L
9.8 cu ft
Length
4,266 mm
168.0 in
Height
1,447 mm
57.0 in
Range score
775 km
481 mi
689 km
428 mi
CO2 score
165 g/km
211 g/km
Trunk score
205 L
7.2 cu ft
278 L
9.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSIVolvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V
Consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.42 LC100 km15.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.00 LC100 mi25.35 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,864 LC/year2,363 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI

  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 86 km (53 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 46 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Is 44 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 73 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI
Volvo C30 2.5 T5 20V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsVolkswagenEos2.0 TSI
2.5 T5 20V
2.5 i 20V T5
VS
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20VvsVolvoC302.5 i 20V T5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsVolkswagenScirocco IIIFacelift 20142.0 TDI
2.5 T5 20V
3.0 dCi V6 FAP
VS
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20VvsRenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)Facelift 20113.0 TDI V6
2.5 T5 20V
1.6 THP
VS
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20VvsPeugeotRCZ1.6 THP
2.0 TSI
E 250 CDI
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 250 CDI
2.5 T5 20V
125i
VS
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20VvsBMW1 Series Coupe (E82)125i
2.5 T5 20V
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20VvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
2.5 T5 20V
2.0 TSI
VS
VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20VvsVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0
VS
VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSIvsSubaruBRZ I2.0
Volkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI vs Volvo C30 · Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V - car comparison - FastVsFaster