Volvo C30 · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Volvo C30 · Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20VvsVolkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Eos · Facelift 2010
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,508 kg3,325 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk278 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions165 g/km
- Best estimated range775 km481 mi
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,508kg3,325lb | 1,563kg3,446lb |
| Gross weight | 1,860kg4,101lb | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 101.1s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.1s Calculated | 33.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 713km443mi Calculated | 775km481mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,266mm168in | 4,423mm174in |
| Width | 1,782mm70in | 1,791mm71in |
| Height | 1,447mm57in | 1,444mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,547mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 278L | 205L |
| Max trunk volume | 921L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 203g/km | 165g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.1 s | 33.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 230 hp 172 kW |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW |
Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V has 20 hp more than Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI and Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 1,508 kg 3,325 lb |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 1,563 kg 3,446 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 6.7 s |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V and Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI and Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 713 km 443 mi |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 775 km 481 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.8 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoC30Facelift 20102.5 T5 20V | VolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,508 kg 3,325 lb | 1,563 kg 3,446 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 713 km 443 mi | 775 km 481 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 203 g/km | 165 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 278 L 9.8 cu ft | 205 L 7.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V | Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.22 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,284 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo C30 Facelift 2010 2.5 T5 20V
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 73 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volkswagen Eos Facelift 2010 2.0 TSI
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 62 km (39 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 38 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























