Volkswagen Arteon
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDIvsXPENG P7+ · Facelift 2026 61.7 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonXPENG P7+ · Facelift 2026
61.7 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,828 kg4,030 lb
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score91/100
XPENG P7+ Facelift 2026 61.7 kWh
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Largest trunk573 L
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | XPENGP7+Facelift 202661.7 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,828kg4,030lb | 2,024kg4,462lb |
| Gross weight | 2,360kg5,203lb | 2,485kg5,478lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 113.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 87.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.5s Calculated | 51.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated | 222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,119km695mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | - |
| Length | 4,862mm191in | 5,071mm200in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,937mm76in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,512mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,837mm112in | 3,000mm118in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,642mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,581mm62in | 1,681mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 138mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 563L | 573L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,931L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 152g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | XPENGP7+Facelift 202661.7 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.5 s | 51.0 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 146 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW |
| XPENGP7+Facelift 202661.7 kWh | 245 hp 183 kW |
XPENG P7+ Facelift 2026 61.7 kWh has 5 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI and XPENG P7+ Facelift 2026 61.7 kWh: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| XPENGP7+Facelift 202661.7 kWh | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 1,828 kg 4,030 lb |
| XPENGP7+Facelift 202661.7 kWh | 2,024 kg 4,462 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| XPENGP7+Facelift 202661.7 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 6.5 s |
| XPENGP7+Facelift 202661.7 kWh | 6.9 s |
Although XPENG P7+ Facelift 2026 61.7 kWh has more power, Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI and XPENG P7+ Facelift 2026 61.7 kWh: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| XPENGP7+Facelift 202661.7 kWh | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| XPENGP7+Facelift 202661.7 kWh | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| XPENGP7+Facelift 202661.7 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | XPENGP7+Facelift 202661.7 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,828 kg 4,030 lb | 2,024 kg 4,462 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,119 km 695 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 152 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | 573 L 20.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 196 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
XPENG P7+ Facelift 2026 61.7 kWh
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























