AUDI A7 Sportback (C8)
Car comparison
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 45 TFSIvsVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Arteon
2.0 BiTDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions152 g/km
- Best estimated range1,119 km695 mi
- Largest trunk563 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score82/100
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 45 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Lightest1,750 kg3,858 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score60/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)45 TFSI | VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | 1,828kg4,030lb |
| Gross weight | 2,375kg5,236lb | 2,360kg5,203lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 114.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 113.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.0s Calculated | 30.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t104kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 926km576mi Calculated | 1,119km695mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,969mm196in | 4,862mm191in |
| Width | 1,908mm75in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,422mm56in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,926mm115in | 2,837mm112in |
| Front track | 1,651mm65in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,637mm64in | 1,581mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 138mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 535L | 563L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 154g/km | 152g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 45 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)45 TFSI | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,600-4,300 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)45 TFSI | VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.0 s | 30.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)45 TFSI | 245 hp 183 kW |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW |
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 45 TFSI has 5 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI and AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 45 TFSI: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)45 TFSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)45 TFSI | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 1,828 kg 4,030 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)45 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)45 TFSI | 6.2 s |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 45 TFSI and Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)45 TFSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI and AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 45 TFSI: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)45 TFSI | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)45 TFSI | 926 km 576 mi |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 1,119 km 695 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)45 TFSI | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)45 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)45 TFSI |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)45 TFSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)45 TFSI | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)45 TFSI | VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb | 1,828 kg 4,030 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 926 km 576 mi | 1,119 km 695 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 154 g/km | 152 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 535 L 18.9 cu ft | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 45 TFSI | Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 45 TFSI
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 78 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI
- Has 130 Nm more
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 192 km (119 mi) more estimated range
- Has 28 L more trunk volume
- Emits 2 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























