Volkswagen Arteon
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDIvsTesla Model S · Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model S · Facelift 2016
60 60 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Most powerful315 hp235 kW
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk745 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,828 kg4,030 lb
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 315hp235kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,828kg4,030lb | 2,027kg4,469lb |
| Gross weight | 2,360kg5,203lb | 2,590kg5,710lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 113.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 77.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.5s Calculated | 33.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,119km695mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | - |
| Length | 4,862mm191in | 4,979mm196in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,964mm77in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,837mm112in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,662mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,581mm62in | 1,700mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 138mm5in | 160mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 563L | 745L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,645L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 152g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.5 s | 33.7 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 315 hp 235 kW |
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh has 75 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI and Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh: 75 hp (56 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 1,828 kg 4,030 lb |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 2,027 kg 4,469 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 6.5 s |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh and Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 315 hp 235 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI | TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 315 hp 235 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,828 kg 4,030 lb | 2,027 kg 4,469 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,119 km 695 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 152 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | 745 L 26.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 199 kg lighter
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh
- Has 75 hp more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 182 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























