Car comparison

Volga C50 2.0T · Stage 3vsVolga C50 2.0T · Stage 2vsVolga C50 2.0T · Stage 1vsVolga C50 2.0T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volga C50

2.0T (Stage 3)

300 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSedan2026-present
VS

Volga C50

2.0T (Stage 2)

260 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSedan2026-present
VS

Volga C50

2.0T (Stage 1)

236 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSedan2026-present
VS

Volga C50

2.0T

200 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSedan2026-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volga C50 2.0T (Stage 3) 300 hp

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    246 km/h
    153 mph
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Highest torque
    504 Nm
    372 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,610 kg
    3,549 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    186 hp/t
    139 kW/t
    5.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.0 L/100 km
    23.5 mpg US
    28.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    681 km
    423 mi
  • Largest trunk
    500 L
  • Best overall score
    70/100
  • Best performance score
    67/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    75/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolgaC502.0T (Stage 3)300 hpVolgaC502.0T (Stage 2)260 hpVolgaC502.0T (Stage 1)236 hpVolgaC502.0T200 hp
Power
300hp224kW+100 hp
260hp194kW+60 hp
236hp176kW+36 hp
200hp149kW
Torque
504Nm372lb-ft+179 Nm
439Nm324lb-ft+114 Nm
397Nm292lb-ft+72 Nm
325Nm240lb-ft
Curb weight
1,610kg3,549lb
1,610kg3,549lb
1,610kg3,549lb
1,610kg3,549lb
Gross weight
2,043kg4,504lb
2,043kg4,504lb
2,043kg4,504lb
2,043kg4,504lb
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
+21 km/h
236 km/h
147 mph
+11 km/h
229 km/h
142 mph
+4 km/h
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
48.8s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph-11.8 s
Calculated
52.2s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph-8.4 s
Calculated
54.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph-6.3 s
Calculated
60.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.5s-1.6 s
6.0s-1.1 s
6.4s-0.7 s
7.1s
0-200 km/h
17.7s-10.3 s
Calculated
21.0s-7.0 s
Calculated
23.9s-4.2 s
Calculated
28.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.3s-1.5 s
Calculated
5.8s-1.0 s
Calculated
6.1s-0.7 s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.5s-1.5 s
Calculated
14.1s-1.0 s
Calculated
14.4s-0.6 s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
186hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb
Calculated
161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
147hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
313Nm/t209lb-ft/ton
Calculated
273Nm/t182lb-ft/ton
Calculated
246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton
Calculated
202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
681km423mi
Calculated
681km423mi
Calculated
681km423mi
Calculated
681km423mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,969cc120cu in
1,969cc120cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,825mm190in
4,825mm190in
4,825mm190in
4,825mm190in
Width
1,880mm74in
1,880mm74in
1,880mm74in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,469mm58in
1,469mm58in
1,469mm58in
1,469mm58in
Wheelbase
2,800mm110in
2,800mm110in
2,800mm110in
2,800mm110in
Front track
1,618mm64in
1,618mm64in
1,618mm64in
1,618mm64in
Rear track
1,618mm64in
1,618mm64in
1,618mm64in
1,618mm64in
Ground clearance
147mm6in
147mm6in
147mm6in
147mm6in
Trunk volume
500L
500L
500L
500L
Doors
4
4
4
4
Seats
5
5
5
5
Fuel tank
49L
49L
49L
49L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volga C50 2.0T (Stage 3) 300 hpVolga C50 2.0T (Stage 2) 260 hpVolga C50 2.0T (Stage 1) 236 hpVolga C50 2.0T 200 hpPowerTorque
  • Volga C50 2.0T (Stage 3) 300 hp: Power / Torque
  • Volga C50 2.0T (Stage 2) 260 hp: Power / Torque
  • Volga C50 2.0T (Stage 1) 236 hp: Power / Torque
  • Volga C50 2.0T 200 hp: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 3)300 hp4,500 rpm1,800-4,000 rpm4,750 rpm
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 2)260 hp4,500 rpm1,800-4,000 rpm4,750 rpm
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 1)236 hp4,500 rpm1,800-4,000 rpm4,750 rpm
VolgaC502.0T200 hp4,500 rpm1,800-4,000 rpm4,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolgaC502.0T (Stage 3)300 hpVolgaC502.0T (Stage 2)260 hpVolgaC502.0T (Stage 1)236 hpVolgaC502.0T200 hp
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.3 s
5.8 s
6.1 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.5 s
6.0 s
6.4 s
7.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
17.7 s
21.0 s
23.9 s
28.0 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
229 km/h
142 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.3 s
6.5 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.0 s
9.3 s
9.6 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.5 s
11.9 s
12.2 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.5 s
14.1 s
14.4 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
177 km/h
110 mph
170 km/h
105 mph
165 km/h
102 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 3)300 hp
300 hp
224 kW
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 2)260 hp
260 hp
194 kW
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 1)236 hp
236 hp
176 kW
VolgaC502.0T200 hp
200 hp
149 kW

Volga C50 2.0T (Stage 3) 300 hp has 100 hp more than Volga C50 2.0T 200 hp.

The biggest power difference is between Volga C50 2.0T 200 hp and Volga C50 2.0T (Stage 3) 300 hp: 100 hp (75 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 3)300 hp
504 Nm
372 lb-ft
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 2)260 hp
439 Nm
324 lb-ft
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 1)236 hp
397 Nm
292 lb-ft
VolgaC502.0T200 hp
325 Nm
240 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 3)300 hp
1,610 kg
3,549 lb
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 2)260 hp
1,610 kg
3,549 lb
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 1)236 hp
1,610 kg
3,549 lb
VolgaC502.0T200 hp
1,610 kg
3,549 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 3)300 hp
246 km/h
153 mph
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 2)260 hp
236 km/h
147 mph
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 1)236 hp
229 km/h
142 mph
VolgaC502.0T200 hp
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 3)300 hp5.5 s
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 2)260 hp6.0 s
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 1)236 hp6.4 s
VolgaC502.0T200 hp7.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volga C50 2.0T (Stage 3) 300 hp and Volga C50 2.0T 200 hp: 1.6 s.

The closest cars by acceleration are Volga C50 2.0T (Stage 2) 260 hp and Volga C50 2.0T (Stage 1) 236 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 3)300 hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 2)260 hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 1)236 hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
VolgaC502.0T200 hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 3)300 hp
186 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 2)260 hp
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 1)236 hp
147 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
VolgaC502.0T200 hp
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 3)300 hp
681 km
423 mi
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 2)260 hp
681 km
423 mi
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 1)236 hp
681 km
423 mi
VolgaC502.0T200 hp
681 km
423 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 3)300 hp
300 hp
224 kW
5.5 s
246 km/h
153 mph
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 2)260 hp
260 hp
194 kW
6.0 s
236 km/h
147 mph
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 1)236 hp
236 hp
176 kW
6.4 s
229 km/h
142 mph
VolgaC502.0T200 hp
200 hp
149 kW
7.1 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 3)300 hp
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,825 mm
190.0 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 2)260 hp
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,825 mm
190.0 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 1)236 hp
Power
236 hp
176 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,825 mm
190.0 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
VolgaC502.0T200 hp
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,825 mm
190.0 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 3)300 hp
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 2)260 hp
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 1)236 hp
Power
236 hp
176 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
VolgaC502.0T200 hp
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Volga C50 2.0T (Stage 3) 300 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 3)300 hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
5.5 s
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 2)260 hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
6.0 s
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 1)236 hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
6.4 s
VolgaC502.0T200 hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
7.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 3)300 hp
186 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 2)260 hp
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
VolgaC502.0T (Stage 1)236 hp
147 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
VolgaC502.0T200 hp
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolgaC502.0T (Stage 3)300 hpVolgaC502.0T (Stage 2)260 hpVolgaC502.0T (Stage 1)236 hpVolgaC502.0T200 hp
Power
300 hp
224 kW
260 hp
194 kW
236 hp
176 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
504 Nm
372 lb-ft
439 Nm
324 lb-ft
397 Nm
292 lb-ft
325 Nm
240 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.5 s
6.0 s
6.4 s
7.1 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
229 km/h
142 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,610 kg
3,549 lb
1,610 kg
3,549 lb
1,610 kg
3,549 lb
1,610 kg
3,549 lb
Fuel consumption
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,825 mm
190.0 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,825 mm
190.0 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,825 mm
190.0 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,825 mm
190.0 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
Range score
681 km
423 mi
681 km
423 mi
681 km
423 mi
681 km
423 mi
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
500 L
17.7 cu ft
500 L
17.7 cu ft
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
186 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
147 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
124 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolga C50 2.0T (Stage 3) 300 hpVolga C50 2.0T (Stage 2) 260 hpVolga C50 2.0T (Stage 1) 236 hpVolga C50 2.0T 200 hp
Consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.60 LC100 km12.60 LC100 km12.60 LC100 km12.60 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.28 LC100 mi20.28 LC100 mi20.28 LC100 mi20.28 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,890 LC/year1,890 LC/year1,890 LC/year1,890 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volga C50 2.0T (Stage 3) 300 hp

  • Has 40 hp more
  • Has 65 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volga C50 2.0T
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected

Popular comparisons

120 kWh
Super Sport 8.0 W16
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
8.0
8.0 W16
VS
BugattiW16 Mistral8.0vsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
5.0 V8
8.0 W16
VS
KoenigseggOne:15.0 V8vsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
R 5.0 V8
R 4.8 V8
VS
KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8vsKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
90 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
RimacConcept One90 kWhvsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
70 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
LotusTheory 170 kWhvsMcLarenW14.0 V8
8.3 V16
3.0 V6
VS
BugattiTourbillon8.3 V16vsFerrariF803.0 V6
4.7 V12
6.3 V12
VS
FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12vsFerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
6.5 V12
6.5 V12
VS
Ferrari812 Competizione6.5 V12vsFerrari812 Competizione A6.5 V12
4.7 i V8 32V
4.7 i V8 32V
VS
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VvsKoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLarenSenna4.0 V8vsMcLaren765LT4.0 V8
6.5 V12
6.5 V12
VS
Ferrari12Cilindri6.5 V12vsFerrari12Cilindri Spider6.5 V12
Volga C50 2.0T · Stage 3 vs Volga C50 2.0T · Stage 2 vs Volga C50 2.0T · Stage 1 vs Volga C50 2.0T - car comparison - FastVsFaster