TVR Chimaera
Car comparison
TVR Chimaera 4.6vsVolvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo C70 Convertible
2.3 20V T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
TVR Chimaera 4.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed257 km/h160 mph
- Most powerful288 hp215 kW
- Highest torque407 Nm300 lb-ft
- Lightest1,060 kg2,337 lb
- Best power-to-weight272 hp/t203 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk310 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score69/100
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range598 km372 mi
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | TVRChimaera4.6 | VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 288hp215kW | 239hp178kW |
| Torque | 407Nm300lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,060kg2,337lb | 1,620kg3,571lb |
| Gross weight | 1,280kg2,822lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 50.9s99% target: 254 km/h / 158 mph Calculated | 102.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.5s Calculated | 28.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 272hp/t203kW/t123hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 384Nm/t257lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 422km262mi Calculated | 598km372mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,546cc277cu in | 2,319cc142cu in |
| Length | 3,965mm156in | 4,720mm186in |
| Width | 1,730mm68in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,223mm48in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,282mm90in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,460mm57in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,470mm58in | 1,520mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 310L | 260L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 57L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- TVR Chimaera 4.6: Power / Torque
- Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 5,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 5,100 rpm | 2,700 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TVRChimaera4.6 | VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.5 s | 28.7 s |
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 288 hp 215 kW |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 239 hp 178 kW |
TVR Chimaera 4.6 has 49 hp more than Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5 and TVR Chimaera 4.6: 49 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 4.7 s |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between TVR Chimaera 4.6 and Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5: 2.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5 and TVR Chimaera 4.6: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 272 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 422 km 262 mi |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 598 km 372 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 288 hp 215 kW | 4.7 s | 257 km/h 160 mph |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 239 hp 178 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TVRChimaera4.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TVRChimaera4.6 |
| 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
TVR Chimaera 4.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| TVRChimaera4.6 | 272 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TVRChimaera4.6 | VolvoC70 Convertible2.3 20V T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 288 hp 215 kW | 239 hp 178 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 257 km/h 160 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.5 L/100 km 17.4 mpg US 20.9 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 422 km 262 mi | 598 km 372 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 272 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | TVR Chimaera 4.6 | Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.63 LC100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 38.02 LC100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,025 L535 US gal445 UK gal | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,544 LC/year | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
TVR Chimaera 4.6
- Has 49 hp more
- Has 77 Nm more
- Is 560 kg lighter
- Is 2.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 124 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo C70 Convertible 2.3 20V T5
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 176 km (109 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























