Volvo XC40
Car comparison
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4vsToyota RAV4 V 2.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota RAV4 V
2.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,647 kg3,631 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions154 g/km
- Best estimated range818 km508 mi
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score89/100
Toyota RAV4 V 2.5
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk580 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 243Nm179lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,647kg3,631lb | 1,685kg3,715lb |
| Gross weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 2,125kg4,685lb |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 88.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 86.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 53.7s Calculated | 53.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 144Nm/t96lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 818km508mi Calculated | 764km475mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 2,487cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,425mm174in | 4,600mm181in |
| Width | 1,863mm73in | 1,855mm73in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,690mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,702mm106in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,600mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,626mm64in | 1,630mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 580L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 154g/km | 163g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
- Toyota RAV4 V 2.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 6,600 rpm | 4,000-5,000 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 53.7 s | 53.0 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 200 hp 149 kW |
Toyota RAV4 V 2.5 has 10 hp more than Volvo XC40 2.0 T4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 and Toyota RAV4 V 2.5: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 243 Nm 179 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 8.4 s |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 8.5 s |
Although Toyota RAV4 V 2.5 has more power, Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 and Toyota RAV4 V 2.5: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 and Toyota RAV4 V 2.5: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 818 km 508 mi |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 764 km 475 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.4 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 243 Nm 179 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 818 km 508 mi | 764 km 475 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 154 g/km | 163 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 | Toyota RAV4 V 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Has 57 Nm more
- Is 38 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 54 km (34 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Toyota RAV4 V 2.5
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























