Car comparison

Toyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo · Stage 3vsToyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo · Stage 2vsToyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo · Stage 1vsToyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
VS
VS
VS
Toyota logo

Toyota Celica (T18)

2.0 i 16V Turbo

208 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedCoupe1989-1994

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Toyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3) 312 hp

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    269 km/h
    167 mph
  • Most powerful
    312 hp
    233 kW
  • Highest torque
    426 Nm
    314 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,420 kg
    3,131 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    220 hp/t
    164 kW/t
    4.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.4 L/100 km
    25.0 mpg US
    30.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    12.1 L/100 km
    19.4 mpg US
    23.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    638 km
    397 mi
  • Largest trunk
    320 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    67/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100
  • Best practicality score
    55/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3)312 hpToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 2)270 hpToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 1)245 hpToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo208 hp
Power
312hp233kW+104 hp
270hp202kW+62 hp
245hp183kW+37 hp
208hp155kW
Torque
426Nm314lb-ft+151 Nm
371Nm274lb-ft+96 Nm
336Nm247lb-ft+61 Nm
275Nm203lb-ft
Curb weight
1,420kg3,131lb
1,420kg3,131lb
1,420kg3,131lb
1,420kg3,131lb
Gross weight
1,890kg4,167lb
1,890kg4,167lb
1,890kg4,167lb
1,890kg4,167lb
Top speed
269 km/h
167 mph
+29 km/h
258 km/h
160 mph
+18 km/h
251 km/h
156 mph
+11 km/h
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
79.6s99% target: 266 km/h / 165 mph-16.4 s
Calculated
85.4s99% target: 255 km/h / 159 mph-10.6 s
Calculated
89.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph-6.7 s
Calculated
96.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.1s-1.8 s
6.6s-1.2 s
7.0s-0.8 s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
20.2s-11.6 s
Calculated
23.6s-8.2 s
Calculated
26.3s-5.6 s
Calculated
31.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.8s-1.6 s
Calculated
6.3s-1.1 s
Calculated
6.7s-0.7 s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK
12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK
12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK
12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s-1.5 s
Calculated
14.6s-1.0 s
Calculated
15.0s-0.6 s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb
Calculated
190hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb
Calculated
173hp/t129kW/t78hp/1000 lb
Calculated
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
300Nm/t201lb-ft/ton
Calculated
261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton
Calculated
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
638km397mi
Calculated
638km397mi
Calculated
638km397mi
Calculated
638km397mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,420mm174in
4,420mm174in
4,420mm174in
4,420mm174in
Width
1,690mm67in
1,690mm67in
1,690mm67in
1,690mm67in
Height
1,300mm51in
1,300mm51in
1,300mm51in
1,300mm51in
Wheelbase
2,525mm99in
2,525mm99in
2,525mm99in
2,525mm99in
Front track
1,465mm58in
1,465mm58in
1,465mm58in
1,465mm58in
Rear track
1,430mm56in
1,430mm56in
1,430mm56in
1,430mm56in
Trunk volume
320L
320L
320L
320L
Doors
3
3
3
3
Seats
5
5
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
60L
60L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Toyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3) 312 hpToyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 2) 270 hpToyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 1) 245 hpToyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo 208 hpPowerTorque
  • Toyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3) 312 hp: Power / Torque
  • Toyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 2) 270 hp: Power / Torque
  • Toyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 1) 245 hp: Power / Torque
  • Toyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo 208 hp: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3)312 hp6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 2)270 hp6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 1)245 hp6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo208 hp6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3)312 hpToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 2)270 hpToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 1)245 hpToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo208 hp
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.8 s
6.3 s
6.7 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.1 s
6.6 s
7.0 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
20.2 s
23.6 s
26.3 s
31.8 s
Top speed
269 km/h
167 mph
258 km/h
160 mph
251 km/h
156 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
6.4 s
6.6 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.3 s
9.6 s
9.8 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.9 s
12.3 s
12.6 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
14.6 s
15.0 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
169 km/h
105 mph
161 km/h
100 mph
157 km/h
97 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3)312 hp
312 hp
233 kW
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 2)270 hp
270 hp
202 kW
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 1)245 hp
245 hp
183 kW
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo208 hp
208 hp
155 kW

Toyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3) 312 hp has 104 hp more than Toyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo 208 hp.

The biggest power difference is between Toyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo 208 hp and Toyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3) 312 hp: 104 hp (78 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3)312 hp
426 Nm
314 lb-ft
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 2)270 hp
371 Nm
274 lb-ft
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 1)245 hp
336 Nm
247 lb-ft
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo208 hp
275 Nm
203 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3)312 hp
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 2)270 hp
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 1)245 hp
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo208 hp
1,420 kg
3,131 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3)312 hp
269 km/h
167 mph
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 2)270 hp
258 km/h
160 mph
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 1)245 hp
251 km/h
156 mph
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo208 hp
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3)312 hp6.1 s
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 2)270 hp6.6 s
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 1)245 hp7.0 s
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo208 hp7.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3) 312 hp and Toyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo 208 hp: 1.8 s.

The closest cars by acceleration are Toyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 2) 270 hp and Toyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 1) 245 hp, separated by only 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3)312 hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 2)270 hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 1)245 hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo208 hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3)312 hp
220 hp/t
164 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 2)270 hp
190 hp/t
142 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 1)245 hp
173 hp/t
129 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo208 hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3)312 hp
638 km
397 mi
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 2)270 hp
638 km
397 mi
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 1)245 hp
638 km
397 mi
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo208 hp
638 km
397 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3)312 hp
312 hp
233 kW
6.1 s
269 km/h
167 mph
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 2)270 hp
270 hp
202 kW
6.6 s
258 km/h
160 mph
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 1)245 hp
245 hp
183 kW
7.0 s
251 km/h
156 mph
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo208 hp
208 hp
155 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3)312 hp
Power
312 hp
233 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
269 km/h
167 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
320 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,420 mm
174.0 in
Height
1,300 mm
51.2 in
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 2)270 hp
Power
270 hp
202 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
258 km/h
160 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
320 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,420 mm
174.0 in
Height
1,300 mm
51.2 in
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 1)245 hp
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
251 km/h
156 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
320 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,420 mm
174.0 in
Height
1,300 mm
51.2 in
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo208 hp
Power
208 hp
155 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
320 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,420 mm
174.0 in
Height
1,300 mm
51.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3)312 hp
Power
312 hp
233 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
269 km/h
167 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 2)270 hp
Power
270 hp
202 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
258 km/h
160 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 1)245 hp
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
251 km/h
156 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo208 hp
Power
208 hp
155 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Toyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3) 312 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3)312 hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
6.1 s
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 2)270 hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
6.6 s
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 1)245 hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
7.0 s
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo208 hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3)312 hp
220 hp/t
164 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 2)270 hp
190 hp/t
142 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 1)245 hp
173 hp/t
129 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
ToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo208 hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3)312 hpToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 2)270 hpToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 1)245 hpToyotaCelica (T18)2.0 i 16V Turbo208 hp
Power
312 hp
233 kW
270 hp
202 kW
245 hp
183 kW
208 hp
155 kW
Torque
426 Nm
314 lb-ft
371 Nm
274 lb-ft
336 Nm
247 lb-ft
275 Nm
203 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.1 s
6.6 s
7.0 s
7.8 s
Top speed
269 km/h
167 mph
258 km/h
160 mph
251 km/h
156 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
Fuel consumption
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
320 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,420 mm
174.0 in
Height
1,300 mm
51.2 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
320 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,420 mm
174.0 in
Height
1,300 mm
51.2 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
320 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,420 mm
174.0 in
Height
1,300 mm
51.2 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
320 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,420 mm
174.0 in
Height
1,300 mm
51.2 in
Range score
638 km
397 mi
638 km
397 mi
638 km
397 mi
638 km
397 mi
Trunk score
320 L
11.3 cu ft
320 L
11.3 cu ft
320 L
11.3 cu ft
320 L
11.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
220 hp/t
164 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
190 hp/t
142 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
173 hp/t
129 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleToyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3) 312 hpToyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 2) 270 hpToyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 1) 245 hpToyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo 208 hp
Consumption9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.45 LC100 km16.45 LC100 km16.45 LC100 km16.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.47 LC100 mi26.47 LC100 mi26.47 LC100 mi26.47 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,468 LC/year2,468 LC/year2,468 LC/year2,468 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Toyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo (Stage 3) 312 hp

  • Has 42 hp more
  • Has 55 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Toyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected

Popular comparisons

120 kWh
Super Sport 8.0 W16
VS
RimacNevera120 kWhvsBugattiChironSuper Sport 8.0 W16
8.0
8.0 W16
VS
BugattiW16 Mistral8.0vsBugattiCentodieci8.0 W16
5.0 V8
8.0 W16
VS
KoenigseggOne:15.0 V8vsBugattiDivo8.0 W16
R 5.0 V8
R 4.8 V8
VS
KoenigseggAgeraR 5.0 V8vsKoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8
90 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
RimacConcept One90 kWhvsMcLarenSpeedtail4.0 V8
70 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
LotusTheory 170 kWhvsMcLarenW14.0 V8
8.3 V16
3.0 V6
VS
BugattiTourbillon8.3 V16vsFerrariF803.0 V6
4.7 V12
6.3 V12
VS
FerrariF50 GT4.7 V12vsFerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
6.5 V12
6.5 V12
VS
Ferrari812 Competizione6.5 V12vsFerrari812 Competizione A6.5 V12
4.7 i V8 32V
4.7 i V8 32V
VS
KoenigseggCCR4.7 i V8 32VvsKoenigseggCC8S4.7 i V8 32V
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
McLarenSenna4.0 V8vsMcLaren765LT4.0 V8
6.5 V12
6.5 V12
VS
Ferrari12Cilindri6.5 V12vsFerrari12Cilindri Spider6.5 V12
Toyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo · Stage 3 vs Toyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo · Stage 2 vs Toyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo · Stage 1 vs Toyota Celica (T18) 2.0 i 16V Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster