Tesla Model S · Facelift 2016
Performance 100 kWh
611 hpElectricAWDAutomaticLiftback / fastback2019-2021
Car comparison
Tesla Model S · Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWhvsTesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast 123 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Tesla Cybertruck
Cyberbeast 123 kWh
845 hpElectricAWDAutomaticPickup2023-present
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.5 s
- Fastest top speed261 km/h162 mph
- Lightest2,253 kg4,967 lb
- Best power-to-weight271 hp/t202 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score88/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast 123 kWh
- Most powerful845 hp630 kW
- Largest trunk1,591 L
Specification comparison
| Model | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 611hp456kW | 845hp630kW |
| Torque | 967Nm713lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 2,253kg4,967lb | 3,129kg6,898lb |
| Gross weight | 2,720kg5,997lb | 4,159kg9,169lb |
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 34.9s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph Calculated | 32.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.5s | 2.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.1s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.4s Calculated | 2.5s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 10.3s Calculated | 11.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 271hp/t202kW/t123hp/1000 lb Calculated | 270hp/t201kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 429Nm/t287lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Length | 4,970mm196in | 5,683mm224in |
| Width | 1,964mm77in | 2,032mm80in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,946mm77in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 3,635mm143in |
| Front track | 1,662mm65in | 1,772mm70in |
| Rear track | 1,700mm67in | 1,772mm70in |
| Ground clearance | 160mm6in | 406mm16in |
| Trunk volume | 745L | 1,591L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,645L | 3,421L |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.1 s | 16.4 s |
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.6 s | 1.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.3 s | 4.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.6 s | 9.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.3 s | 11.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 210 km/h 130 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 611 hp 456 kW |
| TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh | 845 hp 630 kW |
Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast 123 kWh has 234 hp more than Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh and Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast 123 kWh: 234 hp (174 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 2,253 kg 4,967 lb |
| TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh | 3,129 kg 6,898 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 2.5 s |
| TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh | 2.7 s |
Although Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast 123 kWh has more power, Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh and Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast 123 kWh: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | 611 hp 456 kW | 2.5 s | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh | 845 hp 630 kW | 2.7 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh | TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 611 hp 456 kW | 845 hp 630 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 967 Nm 713 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.5 s | 2.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,253 kg 4,967 lb | 3,129 kg 6,898 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 745 L 26.3 cu ft | 1,591 L 56.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 271 hp/t 202 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 Performance 100 kWh
- Is 876 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 46 km/h (29 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast 123 kWh
- Has 234 hp more
- Has 846 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Tesla Model S Performance 100 kWh
Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast 123 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWhvsTeslaModel SFacelift 2021Long Range 100 kWh
TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWhvsMercedes-BenzX-classX 350d V6
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWhvsTeslaModel SP90D 90 kWh
TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWhvsTeslaModel XFacelift 2021Long Range 100 kWh
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWhvsAston MartinRapide E65 kWh
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWhvsAUDIRS7 Sportback (C8)4.0 TFSI V8
TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWhvsAUDIRS e-tron GTFacelift 2024105 kWh
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWhvsAston MartinRapide AMR6.0 V12
TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh
TeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWhvsLotusEmeya102 kWh
TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWhvsTeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh
TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWhvsTeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh