Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297)
AMG EQS 53 120 kWh
761 hpElectricAWDAutomaticLiftback / fastback2021-2024
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 120 kWhvsTesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast 123 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Tesla Cybertruck
Cyberbeast 123 kWh
845 hpElectricAWDAutomaticPickup2023-present
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 120 kWh
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,605 kg5,743 lb
- Best power-to-weight292 hp/t218 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score0/100
Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast 123 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.7 s
- Most powerful845 hp630 kW
- Largest trunk1,591 L
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 761hp567kW | 845hp630kW |
| Torque | 1,020Nm752lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 2,605kg5,743lb | 3,129kg6,898lb |
| Gross weight | 3,225kg7,110lb | 4,159kg9,169lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 47.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 32.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s | 2.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.4s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.2s Calculated | 2.5s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 11.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 292hp/t218kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated | 270hp/t201kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 392Nm/t262lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Length | 5,223mm206in | 5,683mm224in |
| Width | 1,926mm76in | 2,032mm80in |
| Height | 1,518mm60in | 1,946mm77in |
| Wheelbase | 3,210mm126in | 3,635mm143in |
| Front track | 1,660mm65in | 1,772mm70in |
| Rear track | 1,653mm65in | 1,772mm70in |
| Ground clearance | 139mm5in | 406mm16in |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 1,591L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,770L | 3,421L |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.2 s | 2.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 2.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.4 s | 16.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 4.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 6.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.6 s | 9.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 11.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 121 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | 761 hp 567 kW |
| TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh | 845 hp 630 kW |
Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast 123 kWh has 84 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 120 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 120 kWh and Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast 123 kWh: 84 hp (63 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | 2,605 kg 5,743 lb |
| TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh | 3,129 kg 6,898 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | 3.4 s |
| TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh | 2.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast 123 kWh and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 120 kWh: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | 292 hp/t 218 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | 761 hp 567 kW | 3.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh | 845 hp 630 kW | 2.7 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 761 hp 567 kW | 845 hp 630 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 2.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 209 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,605 kg 5,743 lb | 3,129 kg 6,898 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 1,591 L 56.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 292 hp/t 218 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 120 kWh
- Is 524 kg lighter
- Has 45 km/h (28 mph) higher top speed
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast 123 kWh
- Has 84 hp more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 981 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 120 kWh
Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast 123 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh
TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWhvsMercedes-BenzX-classX 350d V6
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 580 122 kWh
TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWhvsTeslaModel XFacelift 2021Long Range 100 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWhvsAUDIE5 Sportback100 kWh
TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWhvsTeslaModel SFacelift 2021Long Range 100 kWh
TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWhvsTeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWhvsAUDIRS7 Sportback (C8)4.0 TFSI V8
TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWhvsAUDIRS e-tron GTFacelift 2024105 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWhvsLotusEmeyaR 102 kWh
TeslaCybertruckCyberbeast 123 kWhvsTeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWhvsAston MartinRapide E65 kWh