Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4vsSuzuki Kizashi 2.4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 D4

181 hp1969 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2013-2015
VS

Suzuki Kizashi

2.4

178 hp2393 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan2009-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    181 hp
    135 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    3.7 L/100 km
    63.6 mpg US
    76.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    4.3 L/100 km
    54.7 mpg US
    65.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.4 L/100 km
    69.2 mpg US
    83.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,824 km
    1,134 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    97/100

Suzuki Kizashi 2.4

  • Lightest
    1,494 kg
    3,294 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    119 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.4 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    461 L
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4SuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
181hp135kW
178hp133kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
230Nm170lb-ft
Curb weight
1,577kg3,477lb
1,494kg3,294lb
Gross weight
2,060kg4,542lb
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
72.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
63.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
26.6s
Calculated
35.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
3.4L/100 km69.2mpg US83.1mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,824km1,134mi
Calculated
797km496mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
2,393cc146cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
4,650mm183in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,820mm72in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,470mm58in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,585mm62in
1,575mm62in
Ground clearance
136mm5in
135mm5in
Trunk volume
380L
-
Max trunk volume-
461L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
63L
CO2 emissions-
183g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4Suzuki Kizashi 2.4PowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
  • Suzuki Kizashi 2.4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D44,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm5,000 rpm
SuzukiKizashi2.46,500 rpm4,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4SuzukiKizashi2.4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.6 s
35.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
98 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
181 hp
135 kW
SuzukiKizashi2.4
178 hp
133 kW

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 has 3 hp more than Suzuki Kizashi 2.4.

The biggest power difference is between Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
SuzukiKizashi2.4
230 Nm
170 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
1,577 kg
3,477 lb
SuzukiKizashi2.4
1,494 kg
3,294 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
SuzukiKizashi2.4
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D47.4 s
SuzukiKizashi2.47.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 and Suzuki Kizashi 2.4: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
3.7 L/100 km
63.6 mpg US
76.3 mpg UK
SuzukiKizashi2.4
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 and Suzuki Kizashi 2.4: 4.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
SuzukiKizashi2.4
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
1,824 km
1,134 mi
SuzukiKizashi2.4
797 km
496 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
181 hp
135 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
SuzukiKizashi2.4
178 hp
133 kW
7.8 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Power
181 hp
135 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
SuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
178 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
461 L
16.3 cu ft
Length
4,650 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,470 mm
57.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Power
181 hp
135 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
3.7 L/100 km
63.6 mpg US
76.3 mpg UK
SuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
178 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
3.7 L/100 km
63.6 mpg US
76.3 mpg UK
7.4 s
SuzukiKizashi2.4
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
3.7 L/100 km
63.6 mpg US
76.3 mpg UK
SuzukiKizashi2.4
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4SuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
181 hp
135 kW
178 hp
133 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
230 Nm
170 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,577 kg
3,477 lb
1,494 kg
3,294 lb
Fuel consumption
3.7 L/100 km
63.6 mpg US
76.3 mpg UK
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
461 L
16.3 cu ft
Length
4,650 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,470 mm
57.9 in
Range score
1,824 km
1,134 mi
797 km
496 mi
CO2 score
-
183 g/km
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
461 L
16.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4Suzuki Kizashi 2.4
Consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km6.48 LC100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi10.42 LC100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used555 L147 US gal122 UK gal1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost971.25 LC/year2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Has 170 Nm more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 4.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1,027 km (638 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Suzuki Kizashi 2.4

  • Is 83 kg lighter
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 81 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II 2.0 D4
Suzuki Kizashi 2.4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 D4
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
2.4
2.2 D-CAT
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsToyotaAvensis IIIFacelift 20122.2 D-CAT
2.0 D4
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
2.4
2.2 i-DTEC
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC
2.0 D4
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS902.0 D4
2.4
2.0 TDI
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
2.0 D4
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
2.4
1.6 T4
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
2.0 D4
E 200
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
2.4
2.2 i-DTEC Type S
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsHondaAccord VIII2.2 i-DTEC Type S
2.0 D4
1.8 TFSI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSI
2.0 D4
C 200
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 vs Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster