Subaru Levorg
Car comparison
Subaru Levorg 1.6vsVolkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Passat Variant (B8)
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.4 L/100 km69.2 mpg US83.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions102 g/km
- Best estimated range1,692 km1,052 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score45/100
- Best economy score96/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Subaru Levorg 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.9 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Best power-to-weight108 hp/t80 kW/t9.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | SubaruLevorg1.6 | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,576kg3,474lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 77.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.3s Calculated | 38.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 3.4L/100 km69.2mpg US83.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 159Nm/t106lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 845km525mi Calculated | 1,692km1,052mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,600cc98cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,690mm185in | 4,767mm188in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,490mm59in | 1,477mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,568mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 522L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,446L | 1,780L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 164g/km | 102g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Subaru Levorg 1.6: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 4,800-5,600 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SubaruLevorg1.6 | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.3 s | 38.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 170 hp 127 kW |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Subaru Levorg 1.6 has 20 hp more than Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI and Subaru Levorg 1.6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 1,576 kg 3,474 lb |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 8.9 s |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 8.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 3.9 L/100 km 60.3 mpg US 72.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI and Subaru Levorg 1.6: 3.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 845 km 525 mi |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 1,692 km 1,052 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI |
| 3.9 L/100 km 60.3 mpg US 72.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 3.9 L/100 km 60.3 mpg US 72.4 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 3.9 L/100 km 60.3 mpg US 72.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SubaruLevorg1.6 | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,576 kg 3,474 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 3.9 L/100 km 60.3 mpg US 72.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 845 km 525 mi | 1,692 km 1,052 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 164 g/km | 102 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 522 L 18.4 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Subaru Levorg 1.6 | Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 6.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 10.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 585 L155 US gal129 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,024 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Subaru Levorg 1.6
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TDI
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 146 kg lighter
- Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 847 km (526 mi) more estimated range
- Has 128 L more trunk volume
- Emits 62 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























