Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Superb IV iV 1.5 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Superb IV
iV 1.5 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,541 kg3,397 lb
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,119 km695 mi
- Largest trunk563 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Skoda Superb IV iV 1.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,541kg3,397lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Gross weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 2,337kg5,152lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 125.8s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 122.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.6s Calculated | 37.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 94hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 133Nm/t89lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,119km695mi Calculated | 818km508mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,866mm192in | 4,912mm193in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,849mm73in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,480mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,836mm112in | 2,842mm112in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,583mm62in | 1,572mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 138mm5in | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 563L | 486L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,557L | 1,635L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 45L |
| CO2 emissions | 135g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Superb IV iV 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.6 s | 37.3 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW |
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI has 13 hp more than Skoda Superb IV iV 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb IV iV 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,541 kg 3,397 lb |
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.9 s |
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | 7.1 s |
Although Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI has more power, Skoda Superb IV iV 1.5 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb IV iV 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,119 km 695 mi |
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | 818 km 508 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,541 kg 3,397 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,119 km 695 mi | 818 km 508 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 135 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | 486 L 17.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI | Skoda Superb IV iV 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 334 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 300 km (187 mi) more estimated range
- Has 77 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Skoda Superb IV iV 1.5 TSI
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























