Skoda Superb IV
Car comparison
Skoda Superb IV iV 1.5 TSIvsVolkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,649 kg3,635 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,294 km804 mi
- Largest trunk1,557 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Skoda Superb IV iV 1.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,875kg4,134lb | 1,649kg3,635lb |
| Gross weight | 2,337kg5,152lb | 2,280kg5,027lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 122.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 117.5s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.3s Calculated | 37.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 94hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 133Nm/t89lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 818km508mi Calculated | 1,294km804mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,912mm193in | 4,866mm192in |
| Width | 1,849mm73in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,480mm58in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,842mm112in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 486L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,635L | 1,557L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 134g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Superb IV iV 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | - | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.3 s | 37.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 146 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI has 23 hp more than Skoda Superb IV iV 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb IV iV 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 1,649 kg 3,635 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | 7.1 s |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 7.4 s |
Although Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI has more power, Skoda Superb IV iV 1.5 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb IV iV 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | 818 km 508 mi |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 1,294 km 804 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.4 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb IViV 1.5 TSI | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | 1,649 kg 3,635 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 818 km 508 mi | 1,294 km 804 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 134 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 486 L 17.2 cu ft | 1,557 L 55.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb IV iV 1.5 TSI | Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb IV iV 1.5 TSI
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
- Has 23 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 226 kg lighter
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 476 km (296 mi) more estimated range
- Has 1,071 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























