Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Arteon
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,633 kg3,600 lb
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk625 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,294 km804 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,633kg3,600lb | 1,650kg3,638lb |
| Gross weight | 2,098kg4,625lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 131.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 127.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.7s Calculated | 40.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,065km661mi Calculated | 1,294km804mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,869mm192in | 4,862mm191in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,469mm58in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,837mm112in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | 1,581mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 138mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 625L | 563L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,760L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 134g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | - | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 3,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.7 s | 40.9 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 1,633 kg 3,600 lb |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI and Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 1,065 km 661 mi |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 1,294 km 804 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.8 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,633 kg 3,600 lb | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,065 km 661 mi | 1,294 km 804 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 134 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 625 L 22.1 cu ft | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI
- Is 17 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 62 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
- Has 80 Nm more
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 230 km (143 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























