Volkswagen Arteon
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake · Facelift 2020
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,294 km804 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score93/100
Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,550 kg3,417 lb
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | 1,550kg3,417lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | 2,170kg4,784lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 127.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 78.4s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.9s Calculated | 31.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,294km804mi Calculated | 943km586mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,862mm191in | 4,866mm192in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,451mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,837mm112in | 2,836mm112in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,581mm62in | 1,583mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 563L | 590L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,632L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 134g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | - | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 3,550 rpm |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.9 s | 31.0 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 7.8 s |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 1,294 km 804 mi |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 943 km 586 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.8 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,294 km 804 mi | 943 km 586 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 134 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI | Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 351 km (218 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 27 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























