Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Arteon
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,065 km661 mi
- Largest trunk625 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,525 kg3,362 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,633kg3,600lb | 1,525kg3,362lb |
| Gross weight | 2,098kg4,625lb | 2,130kg4,696lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 131.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 125.2s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.7s Calculated | 37.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,065km661mi Calculated | 1,031km641mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,869mm192in | 4,862mm191in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,469mm58in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,837mm112in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | 1,581mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 138mm5in | 138mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 625L | 563L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,760L | 1,557L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.7 s | 37.2 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 1,633 kg 3,600 lb |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 239 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 7.7 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 1,065 km 661 mi |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 1,031 km 641 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,633 kg 3,600 lb | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,065 km 661 mi | 1,031 km 641 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 625 L 22.1 cu ft | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 33 km (21 mi) more estimated range
- Has 62 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
- Is 108 kg lighter
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























