Skoda Superb III
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Arteon
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk625 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,100 km684 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,526kg3,364lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 2,130kg4,696lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 118.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 127.2s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.2s Calculated | 37.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,031km641mi Calculated | 1,100km684mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,861mm191in | 4,862mm191in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,837mm112in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,574mm62in | 1,581mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 149mm6in | 138mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 625L | 563L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,760L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 146g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 4,180-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,180 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.2 s | 37.5 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 144 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI has 30 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI and Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 239 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 7.0 s |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 1,031 km 641 mi |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 1,100 km 684 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.0 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,031 km 641 mi | 1,100 km 684 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 146 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 625 L 22.1 cu ft | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 96 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 62 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 69 km (43 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























