Skoda Superb III
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSIvsTesla Model S · Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model S · Facelift 2016
60 60 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Most powerful315 hp235 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk745 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 315hp235kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 2,027kg4,469lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 2,590kg5,710lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 118.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 77.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.2s Calculated | 33.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,031km641mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | - |
| Length | 4,861mm191in | 4,979mm196in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,964mm77in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,662mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,574mm62in | 1,700mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 149mm6in | 160mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 625L | 745L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,760L | 1,645L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 146g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.2 s | 33.7 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 315 hp 235 kW |
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh has 95 hp more than Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI and Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh: 95 hp (71 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 2,027 kg 4,469 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 7.0 s |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh and Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI: 1.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.0 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 315 hp 235 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 315 hp 235 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 2,027 kg 4,469 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,031 km 641 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 146 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 625 L 22.1 cu ft | 745 L 26.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI
- Is 597 kg lighter
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh
- Has 95 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























