Car comparison

Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb III

2.0 TSI

220 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2015-2018
VS

Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020

2.0 TDI

200 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2020-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph
  • Most powerful
    220 hp
    164 kW
  • Lightest
    1,430 kg
    3,153 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    154 hp/t
    115 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    134 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,294 km
    804 mi
  • Largest trunk
    1,557 L
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Power
220hp164kW
200hp149kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,430kg3,153lb
1,649kg3,635lb
Gross weight
2,080kg4,586lb
2,280kg5,027lb
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
118.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
117.5s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
32.2s
Calculated
37.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton
Calculated
243Nm/t162lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,031km641mi
Calculated
1,294km804mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,861mm191in
4,866mm192in
Width
1,864mm73in
1,871mm74in
Height
1,468mm58in
1,460mm57in
Wheelbase
2,841mm112in
2,835mm112in
Front track
1,586mm62in
-
Rear track
1,574mm62in
-
Ground clearance
149mm6in
-
Trunk volume
625L
-
Max trunk volume
1,760L
1,557L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
66L
CO2 emissions
146g/km
134g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI4,500-6,200 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,450 rpm
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI-1,750-3,500 rpm3,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.2 s
37.6 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
146 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW

Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI has 20 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI and Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
1,649 kg
3,635 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
245 km/h
152 mph
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
234 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI7.0 s
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI7.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI and Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
1,031 km
641 mi
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
1,294 km
804 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
7.0 s
245 km/h
152 mph
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
7.4 s
234 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,861 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,557 L
55.0 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.0 s
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
7.4 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
1,649 kg
3,635 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,861 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,557 L
55.0 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Range score
1,031 km
641 mi
1,294 km
804 mi
CO2 score
146 g/km
134 g/km
Trunk score
625 L
22.1 cu ft
1,557 L
55.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb III 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km8.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi14.36 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal765 L202 US gal168 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year1,339 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Is 219 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI

  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 263 km (163 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 932 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 12 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)3.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6 ultra
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)Facelift 20143.0 TDI V6 ultra
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 201940 TDI
2.0 TSI
45 TDI V6
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)45 TDI V6
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsAUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
60 60 kWh
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsTeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh
2.0 TDI
EQS 350 100 kWh
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI vs Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster