Car comparison

Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb III

2.0 TSI

272 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2018-2019
VS

Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020

2.0 TSI

280 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2020-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,554 kg
    3,426 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    175 hp/t
    131 kW/t
    5.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.9 L/100 km
    26.4 mpg US
    31.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    930 km
    578 mi
  • Largest trunk
    625 L
  • Best overall score
    70/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
272hp203kW
280hp209kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,554kg3,426lb
1,656kg3,651lb
Gross weight
2,234kg4,925lb
2,270kg5,004lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
100.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
93.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.5s
5.5s
0-200 km/h
23.0s
Calculated
22.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.2s
Calculated
5.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.7s
Calculated
13.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
175hp/t131kW/t79hp/1000 lb
Calculated
169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
930km578mi
Calculated
930km578mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,861mm191in
4,866mm192in
Width
1,864mm73in
1,871mm74in
Height
1,468mm58in
1,460mm57in
Wheelbase
2,841mm112in
2,835mm112in
Front track
1,586mm62in
1,591mm63in
Rear track
1,574mm62in
1,580mm62in
Ground clearance
133mm5in
138mm5in
Trunk volume
625L
563L
Max trunk volume
1,760L
1,557L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI5,500-6,500 rpm2,000-5,400 rpm6,750 rpm
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI5,100-6,500 rpm2,000-4,900 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.2 s
5.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.5 s
5.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.0 s
22.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.9 s
8.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.5 s
11.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.7 s
13.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
165 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
272 hp
203 kW
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
280 hp
209 kW

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI has 8 hp more than Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
1,554 kg
3,426 lb
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1,656 kg
3,651 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI5.5 s
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI5.5 s

Although Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI has more power, Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
175 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
930 km
578 mi
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
930 km
578 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
272 hp
203 kW
5.5 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
280 hp
209 kW
5.5 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,861 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
5.5 s
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
5.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
175 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
272 hp
203 kW
280 hp
209 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.5 s
5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,554 kg
3,426 lb
1,656 kg
3,651 lb
Fuel consumption
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,861 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Range score
930 km
578 mi
930 km
578 mi
Trunk score
625 L
22.1 cu ft
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
175 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb III 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.42 LC100 km12.42 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.00 LC100 mi20.00 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,864 LC/year1,864 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI

  • Is 102 kg lighter
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 62 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
50 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)50 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
50 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)50 TDI
2.0 TSI
50 TDI V6
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 201950 TDI V6
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)Facelift 20143.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsAUDIS7 Sportback (C8)3.0 TDI V6
2.0 TSI
50 TDI V6
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202350 TDI V6
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsAUDIS5 Sportback (F5)3.0 TDI V6
2.0 TSI
EQS 350 100 kWh
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsAUDIS5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 20193.0 TDI V6
2.0 TSI
60 60 kWh
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsTeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI vs Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster