Skoda Superb III
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSIvsTesla Model S · Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model S · Facelift 2016
60 60 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,554 kg3,426 lb
- Best power-to-weight175 hp/t131 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score88/100
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh
- Most powerful315 hp235 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Largest trunk745 L
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272hp203kW | 315hp235kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,554kg3,426lb | 2,027kg4,469lb |
| Gross weight | 2,234kg4,925lb | 2,590kg5,710lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 100.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 77.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.0s Calculated | 33.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 175hp/t131kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 930km578mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | - |
| Length | 4,861mm191in | 4,979mm196in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,964mm77in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,662mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,574mm62in | 1,700mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 133mm5in | 160mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 625L | 745L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,760L | 1,645L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.0 s | 33.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 272 hp 203 kW |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 315 hp 235 kW |
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh has 43 hp more than Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI and Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh: 43 hp (32 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 1,554 kg 3,426 lb |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 2,027 kg 4,469 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 5.5 s |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 5.8 s |
Although Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh has more power, Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI and Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 272 hp 203 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 315 hp 235 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp 203 kW | 315 hp 235 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,554 kg 3,426 lb | 2,027 kg 4,469 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 930 km 578 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 625 L 22.1 cu ft | 745 L 26.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI
- Is 473 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh
- Has 43 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























