Skoda Octavia III Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI · Stage 3vsSkoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI · Stage 2vsSkoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI · Stage 1vsSkoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia III Combi
RS 2.0 TDI (Stage 2)
Skoda Octavia III Combi
RS 2.0 TDI (Stage 1)
Skoda Octavia III Combi
RS 2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3) 285 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed266 km/h165 mph
- Most powerful285 hp213 kW
- Highest torque608 Nm448 lb-ft
- Lightest1,412 kg3,113 lb
- Best power-to-weight202 hp/t151 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,042 km647 mi
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score69/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3)285 hp | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 2)248 hp | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 1)221 hp | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI184 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 285hp213kW+101 hp | 248hp185kW+64 hp | 221hp165kW+37 hp | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 608Nm448lb-ft+228 Nm | 532Nm392lb-ft+152 Nm | 475Nm350lb-ft+95 Nm | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,412kg3,113lb | 1,412kg3,113lb | 1,412kg3,113lb | 1,412kg3,113lb |
| Gross weight | 1,978kg4,361lb | 1,978kg4,361lb | 1,978kg4,361lb | 1,978kg4,361lb |
| Top speed | 266 km/h 165 mph | 253 km/h 157 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 62.2s99% target: 263 km/h / 164 mph-12.6 s Calculated | 66.4s99% target: 250 km/h / 156 mph-8.3 s Calculated | 69.8s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph-5.0 s Calculated | 74.7s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s-1.9 s | 6.6s-1.4 s | 7.1s-0.9 s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.4s-13.7 s Calculated | 21.6s-10.5 s Calculated | 24.9s-7.2 s Calculated | 32.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s-1.8 s Calculated | 6.3s-1.3 s Calculated | 6.8s-0.8 s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s-1.8 s Calculated | 14.6s-1.2 s Calculated | 15.0s-0.7 s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 202hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated | 176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 431Nm/t288lb-ft/ton Calculated | 377Nm/t252lb-ft/ton Calculated | 336Nm/t225lb-ft/ton Calculated | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,042km647mi Calculated | 1,042km647mi Calculated | 1,042km647mi Calculated | 1,042km647mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,685mm184in | 4,685mm184in | 4,685mm184in | 4,685mm184in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,814mm71in | 1,814mm71in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,452mm57in | 1,452mm57in | 1,452mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,680mm106in | 2,680mm106in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,535mm60in | 1,535mm60in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,506mm59in | 1,506mm59in | 1,506mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 128mm5in | 128mm5in | 128mm5in | 128mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 610L | 610L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,740L | 1,740L | 1,740L | 1,740L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L | 50L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3) 285 hp: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI (Stage 2) 248 hp: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI (Stage 1) 221 hp: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI 184 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3)285 hp | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 2)248 hp | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 1)221 hp | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI184 hp | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3)285 hp | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 2)248 hp | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 1)221 hp | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI184 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.3 s | 6.8 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.6 s | 7.1 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.4 s | 21.6 s | 24.9 s | 32.1 s |
| Top speed | 266 km/h 165 mph | 253 km/h 157 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.7 s | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.4 s | 12.7 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.6 s | 15.0 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 108 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3)285 hp | 285 hp 213 kW |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 2)248 hp | 248 hp 185 kW |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 1)221 hp | 221 hp 165 kW |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI184 hp | 184 hp 137 kW |
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3) 285 hp has 101 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI 184 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI 184 hp and Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3) 285 hp: 101 hp (75 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3)285 hp | 608 Nm 448 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 2)248 hp | 532 Nm 392 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 1)221 hp | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI184 hp | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3)285 hp | 1,412 kg 3,113 lb |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 2)248 hp | 1,412 kg 3,113 lb |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 1)221 hp | 1,412 kg 3,113 lb |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI184 hp | 1,412 kg 3,113 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3)285 hp | 266 km/h 165 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 2)248 hp | 253 km/h 157 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 1)221 hp | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI184 hp | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3)285 hp | 6.1 s |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 2)248 hp | 6.6 s |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 1)221 hp | 7.1 s |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI184 hp | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3) 285 hp and Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI 184 hp: 1.9 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI (Stage 2) 248 hp and Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI (Stage 1) 221 hp, separated by only 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3)285 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 2)248 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 1)221 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI184 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3)285 hp | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 2)248 hp | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 1)221 hp | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI184 hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3)285 hp | 1,042 km 647 mi |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 2)248 hp | 1,042 km 647 mi |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 1)221 hp | 1,042 km 647 mi |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI184 hp | 1,042 km 647 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3)285 hp | 285 hp 213 kW | 6.1 s | 266 km/h 165 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 2)248 hp | 248 hp 185 kW | 6.6 s | 253 km/h 157 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 1)221 hp | 221 hp 165 kW | 7.1 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI184 hp | 184 hp 137 kW | 8.0 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3)285 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 2)248 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 1)221 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI184 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3)285 hp |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 2)248 hp |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 1)221 hp |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI184 hp |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3) 285 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3)285 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 2)248 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 1)221 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI184 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3)285 hp | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 2)248 hp | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 1)221 hp | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI184 hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3)285 hp | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 2)248 hp | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI (Stage 1)221 hp | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI184 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 285 hp 213 kW | 248 hp 185 kW | 221 hp 165 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 608 Nm 448 lb-ft | 532 Nm 392 lb-ft | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.6 s | 7.1 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 266 km/h 165 mph | 253 km/h 157 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,412 kg 3,113 lb | 1,412 kg 3,113 lb | 1,412 kg 3,113 lb | 1,412 kg 3,113 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,042 km 647 mi | 1,042 km 647 mi | 1,042 km 647 mi | 1,042 km 647 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3) 285 hp | Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI (Stage 2) 248 hp | Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI (Stage 1) 221 hp | Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI 184 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI (Stage 3) 285 hp
- Has 37 hp more
- Has 76 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI (Stage 2) 248 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























