Car comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDIvsMini Clubman (F54) 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi

RS 2.0 TDI

184 hp1968 ccDieselFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2013-2017
VS

Mini Clubman (F54)

2.0d

190 hp1995 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,405 kg
    3,097 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    135 hp/t
    101 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.1 L/100 km
    57.4 mpg US
    68.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,091 km
    678 mi
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDIMiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Power
184hp137kW
190hp142kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,412kg3,113lb
1,405kg3,097lb
Gross weight
1,978kg4,361lb
1,980kg4,365lb
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
74.7s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
68.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.0s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
32.1s
Calculated
30.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.6s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton
Calculated
285Nm/t190lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,042km647mi
Calculated
1,091km678mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,685mm184in
4,253mm167in
Width
1,814mm71in
1,800mm71in
Height
1,452mm57in
1,441mm57in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,535mm60in
1,560mm61in
Rear track
1,506mm59in
1,561mm61in
Ground clearance
128mm5in
141mm6in
Trunk volume
610L
360L
Max trunk volume
1,740L
1,250L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
48L
CO2 emissions-
117g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDIMini Clubman (F54) 2.0dPowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,750-3,250 rpm4,250 rpm
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDIMiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.6 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.0 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.1 s
30.8 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
184 hp
137 kW
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
190 hp
142 kW

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d has 6 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI and Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
1,412 kg
3,113 lb
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
1,405 kg
3,097 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
228 km/h
142 mph
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI8.0 s
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d7.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d and Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
1,042 km
647 mi
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
1,091 km
678 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
184 hp
137 kW
8.0 s
228 km/h
142 mph
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
8.0 s
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDIMiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Power
184 hp
137 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.0 s
7.4 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,412 kg
3,113 lb
1,405 kg
3,097 lb
Fuel consumption
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in
Range score
1,042 km
647 mi
1,091 km
678 mi
CO2 score
-
117 g/km
Trunk score
610 L
21.5 cu ft
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDIMini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
Consumption4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.40 LC100 km7.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.52 LC100 mi12.39 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used720 L190 US gal158 UK gal660 L174 US gal145 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,260 LC/year1,155 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI

  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 250 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 7 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 49 km (31 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 TDI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI
2.0d
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsMiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
RS 2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDIvsSeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI
2.0d
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI
RS 2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI
2.0d
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsSeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI
RS 2.0 TDI
1.8 TFSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20141.8 TFSI
2.0d
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TDI
2.0d
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
2.0d
1.8 TFSI ultra
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra
2.0d
GT 1.6 Energy TCe
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsRenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe
RS 2.0 TDI
2.0d
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDIvsMiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI vs Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster