Car comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDIvsAUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) · Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi

RS 2.0 TDI

184 hp1968 ccDieselFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2013-2017
VS

AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) · Facelift 2016

1.8 TFSI ultra

190 hp1798 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    228 km/h
    142 mph
  • Highest torque
    380 Nm
    280 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,412 kg
    3,113 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    130 hp/t
    97 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.3 L/100 km
    54.7 mpg US
    65.7 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    610 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDIAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra
Power
184hp137kW
190hp142kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,412kg3,113lb
1,635kg3,605lb
Gross weight
1,978kg4,361lb
2,265kg4,993lb
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
74.7s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
79.2s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.0s
8.2s
0-200 km/h
32.1s
Calculated
34.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.6s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton
Calculated
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,042km647mi
Calculated
1,083km673mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,798cc110cu in
Length
4,685mm184in
4,943mm195in
Width
1,814mm71in
1,874mm74in
Height
1,452mm57in
1,461mm58in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,912mm115in
Front track
1,535mm60in
1,627mm64in
Rear track
1,506mm59in
1,618mm64in
Ground clearance
128mm5in
-
Trunk volume
610L
565L
Max trunk volume
1,740L
1,680L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
65L
CO2 emissions-
142g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDIAUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultraPowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,750-3,250 rpm4,250 rpm
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra4,200-6,200 rpm1,400-4,100 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDIAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.6 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.0 s
8.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.1 s
34.5 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
15.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra has 6 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI and AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
1,412 kg
3,113 lb
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra
1,635 kg
3,605 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
228 km/h
142 mph
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra
226 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra has more power, Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI and AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI and AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
1,042 km
647 mi
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra
1,083 km
673 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
184 hp
137 kW
8.0 s
228 km/h
142 mph
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra
190 hp
142 kW
8.2 s
226 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,943 mm
194.6 in
Height
1,461 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
8.0 s
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
8.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
AUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDIAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra
Power
184 hp
137 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.0 s
8.2 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,412 kg
3,113 lb
1,635 kg
3,605 lb
Fuel consumption
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,943 mm
194.6 in
Height
1,461 mm
57.5 in
Range score
1,042 km
647 mi
1,083 km
673 mi
CO2 score
-
142 g/km
Trunk score
610 L
21.5 cu ft
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDIAUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra
Consumption4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.40 LC100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.52 LC100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used720 L190 US gal158 UK gal900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,260 LC/year1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI

  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Is 223 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 45 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI
AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) 1.8 TFSI ultra
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI vs AUDI A6 Avant (4G/C7) · Facelift 2016 1.8 TFSI ultra - car comparison - FastVsFaster