Skoda Octavia III Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDIvsMini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Clubman (R55)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,042 km647 mi
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Lightest1,230 kg2,712 lb
- Best power-to-weight150 hp/t112 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,412kg3,113lb | 1,230kg2,712lb |
| Gross weight | 1,978kg4,361lb | 1,715kg3,781lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.7s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 65.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.1s Calculated | 31.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,042km647mi Calculated | 781km485mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,685mm184in | 3,961mm156in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,683mm66in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,432mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,547mm100in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,453mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,461mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 128mm5in | 135mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 260L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,740L | 930L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 150g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.1 s | 31.9 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI | 1,412 kg 3,113 lb |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI | 8.0 s |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 and Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI and Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI | 1,042 km 647 mi |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 781 km 485 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 8.0 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.7 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TDI | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,412 kg 3,113 lb | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,042 km 647 mi | 781 km 485 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 150 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI | Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI
- Has 120 Nm more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 260 km (162 mi) more estimated range
- Has 350 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6
- Is 182 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























