Car comparison

Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017 1.8 TSIvsVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017

1.8 TSI

180 hp1798 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2017-2018
VS

Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboHatchback2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.2 L/100 km
    56.0 mpg US
    67.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.7 L/100 km
    63.6 mpg US
    76.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    109 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,476 km
    917 mi
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    231 km/h
    144 mph
  • Lightest
    1,245 kg
    2,745 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    145 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    590 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSIVolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
Power
180hp134kW
190hp142kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,245kg2,745lb
1,503kg3,314lb
Gross weight
1,830kg4,034lb
2,005kg4,420lb
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
80.0s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
83.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
31.0s
Calculated
32.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
820km509mi
Calculated
1,476km917mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,798cc110cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,670mm184in
4,369mm172in
Width
1,814mm71in
1,783mm70in
Height
1,461mm58in
1,439mm57in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,647mm104in
Front track
1,543mm61in
1,559mm61in
Rear track
1,542mm61in
1,546mm61in
Ground clearance
141mm6in
144mm6in
Trunk volume
590L
335L
Max trunk volume
1,580L
1,500L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
62L
CO2 emissions
139g/km
109g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 1.8 TSIVolvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4PowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI5,100-6,200 rpm1,250-5,000 rpm6,450 rpm
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D44,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSIVolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.0 s
32.1 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW

Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 has 10 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
1,245 kg
2,745 lb
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
1,503 kg
3,314 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
231 km/h
144 mph
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI7.3 s
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D47.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI: 1.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
820 km
509 mi
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
1,476 km
917 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW
7.3 s
231 km/h
144 mph
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
590 L
20.8 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,461 mm
57.5 in
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
335 L
11.8 cu ft
Length
4,369 mm
172.0 in
Height
1,439 mm
56.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK

Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
7.3 s
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSIVolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
Power
180 hp
134 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
7.2 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,245 kg
2,745 lb
1,503 kg
3,314 lb
Fuel consumption
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
4.2 L/100 km
56.0 mpg US
67.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
590 L
20.8 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,461 mm
57.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
335 L
11.8 cu ft
Length
4,369 mm
172.0 in
Height
1,439 mm
56.7 in
Range score
820 km
509 mi
1,476 km
917 mi
CO2 score
139 g/km
109 g/km
Trunk score
590 L
20.8 cu ft
335 L
11.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 1.8 TSIVolvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
Consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.67 LC100 km7.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.18 LC100 mi11.83 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used915 L242 US gal201 UK gal630 L166 US gal139 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,601 LC/year1,103 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI

  • Is 258 kg lighter
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 255 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 657 km (408 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 30 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI
Volvo V40 2.0 D4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.8 TSI
FR 1.8 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSIvsSeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 1.8 TSI
2.0 D4
1.6 T4
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4vsVolvoV401.6 T4
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSIvsSeatLeon IIIFacelift 20161.8 TSI
2.0 D4
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4vsVolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D4
1.8 TSI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)Facelift 2017GTD 2.0 TDI
2.0 D4
1.6 T4
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4vsVolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4
1.8 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSIvsAUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
1.8 TSI
Competizione 1.4 T-Jet
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSIvsAbarth595Facelift 2016Competizione 1.4 T-Jet
1.8 TSI
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSIvsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
1.8 TSI
Rivale 1.4 T-Jet
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSIvsAbarth695Rivale 1.4 T-Jet
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4vsAUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
1.8 TSI
1.4 TB MultiAir
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSIvsAlfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI vs Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster