Car comparison

Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017 1.8 TSIvsAlfa Romeo MiTo · Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017

1.8 TSI

180 hp1798 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2017-2018
VS

Alfa Romeo MiTo · Facelift 2016

1.4 TB MultiAir

170 hp1368 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    231 km/h
    144 mph
  • Most powerful
    180 hp
    134 kW
  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    590 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir

  • Lightest
    1,170 kg
    2,579 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    145 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    833 km
    518 mi
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSIAlfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
Power
180hp134kW
170hp127kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,245kg2,745lb
1,170kg2,579lb
Gross weight
1,830kg4,034lb
1,650kg3,638lb
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
To 99% top speed
80.0s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
73.2s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
31.0s
Calculated
35.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
820km509mi
Calculated
833km518mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,798cc110cu in
1,368cc83cu in
Length
4,670mm184in
4,063mm160in
Width
1,814mm71in
1,720mm68in
Height
1,461mm58in
1,446mm57in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,511mm99in
Front track
1,543mm61in
1,475mm58in
Rear track
1,542mm61in
1,469mm58in
Ground clearance
141mm6in
-
Trunk volume
590L
270L
Max trunk volume
1,580L
950L
Doors
5
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
50L
45L
CO2 emissions
139g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 1.8 TSIAlfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAirPowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI5,100-6,200 rpm1,250-5,000 rpm6,450 rpm
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir5,500 rpm2,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSIAlfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.0 s
35.7 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
170 hp
127 kW

Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI has 10 hp more than Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
1,245 kg
2,745 lb
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
1,170 kg
2,579 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
231 km/h
144 mph
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
219 km/h
136 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI7.3 s
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir7.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI and Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
820 km
509 mi
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
833 km
518 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW
7.3 s
231 km/h
144 mph
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
170 hp
127 kW
7.4 s
219 km/h
136 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
590 L
20.8 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,461 mm
57.5 in
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
4,063 mm
160.0 in
Height
1,446 mm
56.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
7.3 s
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSI
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSIAlfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
Power
180 hp
134 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
7.4 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
Lightness
1,245 kg
2,745 lb
1,170 kg
2,579 lb
Fuel consumption
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
590 L
20.8 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,461 mm
57.5 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
4,063 mm
160.0 in
Height
1,446 mm
56.9 in
Range score
820 km
509 mi
833 km
518 mi
CO2 score
139 g/km
-
Trunk score
590 L
20.8 cu ft
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 1.8 TSIAlfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir
Consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.67 LC100 km9.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.18 LC100 mi15.21 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used915 L242 US gal201 UK gal810 L214 US gal178 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,601 LC/year1,418 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 320 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir

  • Is 75 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 14 km (8 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI
Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TB MultiAir
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.8 TSI
FR 1.8 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSIvsSeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 1.8 TSI
1.4 TB MultiAir
1.4 TP
VS
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsAlfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20131.4 TP
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSIvsSeatLeon IIIFacelift 20161.8 TSI
1.4 TB MultiAir
1.4 TB MultiAir
VS
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsAlfa RomeoMiTo1.4 TB MultiAir
1.8 TSI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)Facelift 2017GTD 2.0 TDI
1.4 TB MultiAir
1.4 TB MultiAir
VS
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsAlfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)Facelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir
1.8 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSIvsAUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
1.4 TB MultiAir
1.4 MultiAir
VS
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsAlfa RomeoGiulietta (TYPE 940)1.4 MultiAir
1.8 TSI
Competizione 1.4 T-Jet
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSIvsAbarth595Facelift 2016Competizione 1.4 T-Jet
1.4 TB MultiAir
XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet
VS
Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAirvsAbarth695XSR Yamaha 1.4 T-Jet
1.8 TSI
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSIvsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
1.8 TSI
2.0 D4
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20171.8 TSIvsVolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI vs Alfa Romeo MiTo · Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir - car comparison - FastVsFaster