Skoda Octavia II Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSIvsVolvo V70 II · Facelift 2004 2.5T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V70 II · Facelift 2004
2.5T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Lightest1,415 kg3,120 lb
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk580 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best estimated range727 km452 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,415kg3,120lb | 1,666kg3,673lb |
| Gross weight | 1,955kg4,310lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.6s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 72.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.3s Calculated | 32.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 696km433mi Calculated | 727km452mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,572mm180in | 4,710mm185in |
| Width | 1,769mm70in | 1,804mm71in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,490mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,755mm108in |
| Front track | 1,526mm60in | 1,551mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,548mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 580L | 485L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,630L | 1,641L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 72L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.3 s | 32.3 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 210 hp 157 kW |
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T has 10 hp more than Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI and Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 1,666 kg 3,673 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 7.5 s |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 7.6 s |
Although Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T has more power, Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI and Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI and Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 696 km 433 mi |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 727 km 452 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.6 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | 1,666 kg 3,673 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 696 km 433 mi | 727 km 452 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI | Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI
- Is 251 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 95 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Has 31 km (19 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























