Volvo V50
Car comparison
Volvo V50 2.5 T5vsSkoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia II Combi
RS 2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI
- Lightest1,415 kg3,120 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range696 km433 mi
- Largest trunk580 L
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Volvo V50 2.5 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV502.5 T5 | SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,480kg3,263lb | 1,415kg3,120lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 1,955kg4,310lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 72.6s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 27.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 604km375mi Calculated | 696km433mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,514mm178in | 4,572mm180in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,769mm70in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,468mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,526mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,514mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 417L | 580L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,307L | 1,630L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 229g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V50 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV502.5 T5 | SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 27.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Volvo V50 2.5 T5 has 20 hp more than Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI and Volvo V50 2.5 T5: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 7.2 s |
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V50 2.5 T5 and Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI and Volvo V50 2.5 T5: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 604 km 375 mi |
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 696 km 433 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V50 2.5 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV502.5 T5 | SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 604 km 375 mi | 696 km 433 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 229 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 417 L 14.7 cu ft | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V50 2.5 T5 | Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V50 2.5 T5
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 92 km (57 mi) more estimated range
- Has 163 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























