Volvo V50
Car comparison
Volvo V50 2.5 T5vsVolvo XC70 II 3.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC70 II
3.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V50 2.5 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,480 kg3,263 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions229 g/km
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score81/100
Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6
- Most powerful285 hp213 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Best estimated range609 km378 mi
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV502.5 T5 | VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 285hp213kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,480kg3,263lb | 1,769kg3,900lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 69.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 34.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 604km375mi Calculated | 609km378mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,953cc180cu in |
| Length | 4,514mm178in | 4,838mm190in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,861mm73in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,604mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,815mm111in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,614mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 210mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 417L | 575L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,307L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 229g/km | 269g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V50 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 5,950 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 6,200 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV502.5 T5 | VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 34.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 285 hp 213 kW |
Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 has 65 hp more than Volvo V50 2.5 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V50 2.5 T5 and Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6: 65 hp (48 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 1,769 kg 3,900 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 7.2 s |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 7.6 s |
Although Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 has more power, Volvo V50 2.5 T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V50 2.5 T5 and Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V50 2.5 T5 and Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 604 km 375 mi |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 609 km 378 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 285 hp 213 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V50 2.5 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV502.5 T5 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV502.5 T5 | VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 285 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | 1,769 kg 3,900 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 604 km 375 mi | 609 km 378 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 229 g/km | 269 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 417 L 14.7 cu ft | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V50 2.5 T5 | Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V50 2.5 T5
- Is 289 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 40 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6
- Has 65 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 5 km (3 mi) more estimated range
- Has 158 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























