Skoda Octavia II Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSIvsVolkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Golf V Variant
1.4 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk580 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI
- Lightest1,383 kg3,049 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range743 km462 mi
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,415kg3,120lb | 1,383kg3,049lb |
| Gross weight | 1,955kg4,310lb | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.6s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 74.3s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.3s Calculated | 38.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 174Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 696km433mi Calculated | 743km462mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,390cc85cu in |
| Length | 4,572mm180in | 4,556mm179in |
| Width | 1,769mm70in | 1,781mm70in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,504mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,526mm60in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,508mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 580L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,630L | 1,495L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 6,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.3 s | 38.2 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 170 hp 127 kW |
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI has 30 hp more than Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI and Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 1,383 kg 3,049 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 7.5 s |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI and Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI and Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 696 km 433 mi |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 743 km 462 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.3 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia II CombiRS 2.0 TFSI | VolkswagenGolf V Variant1.4 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | 1,383 kg 3,049 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 696 km 433 mi | 743 km 462 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI | Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia II Combi RS 2.0 TFSI
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 75 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Golf V Variant 1.4 TSI
- Is 32 kg lighter
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 47 km (29 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























