Car comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I

GT TSI330

186 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2021
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselAWDManualTwin-turboSUV2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,000 km
    621 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,600 kg
    3,527 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    116 hp/t
    87 kW/t
    8.6 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    44/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
186hp139kW
190hp142kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,600kg3,527lb
1,985kg4,376lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
91.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
93.0s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
56.1s
Calculated
71.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
96hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
896km556mi
Calculated
1,000km621mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,634mm182in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,883mm74in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,649mm65in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,791mm110in
2,865mm113in
Front track-
1,668mm66in
Rear track-
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance-
216mm9in
Trunk volume
463L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,607L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
55L
CO2 emissions-
145g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4PowerTorque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3304,100-6,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D44,250 rpm1,740-2,520 rpm5,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
56.1 s
71.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
87 mph
138 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
186 hp
139 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has 4 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,985 kg
4,376 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3308.8 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D48.8 s

Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has more power, Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
96 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
896 km
556 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,000 km
621 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
186 hp
139 kW
8.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
8.8 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
8.8 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
96 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.4 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
186 hp
139 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
1,985 kg
4,376 lb
Fuel consumption
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
896 km
556 mi
1,000 km
621 mi
CO2 score
-
145 g/km
Trunk score
463 L
16.4 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
96 hp/t
71 kW/t
10.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.73 LC100 km9.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.87 LC100 mi15.49 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal825 L218 US gal181 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,759 LC/year1,444 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330

  • Is 385 kg lighter
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 104 km (65 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 42 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GT TSI330
330TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
2.0 D4
2.0 T4
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolvoXC402.0 T4
GT TSI330
2.0 D4
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
2.0 D4
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
GT TSI330
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 D4
20d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsJaguarF-Pace20d
2.0 D4
2.0 TSI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
2.0 D4
40 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
2.0 D4
350h
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
GT TSI330
2.5
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsToyotaRAV4 V2.5
2.0 D4
2.2 JTDM
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster