Jaguar F-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace 20dvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 20d
- Fastest top speed208 km/h129 mph
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lightest1,845 kg4,068 lb
- Best power-to-weight98 hp/t73 kW/t10.3 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,017 km632 mi
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.8 s
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions145 g/km
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-Pace20d | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,845kg4,068lb | 1,985kg4,376lb |
| Gross weight | 2,460kg5,423lb | - |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 103.0s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated | 92.8s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.0s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 66.8s Calculated | 71.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 98hp/t73kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated | 96hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated | 202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,017km632mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,731mm186in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 2,071mm82in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,666mm66in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,641mm65in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,654mm65in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 215mm8in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | - | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 155g/km | 145g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-Pace 20d: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,740-2,520 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-Pace20d | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.0 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 66.8 s | 71.4 s |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 136 km/h 85 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 180 hp 134 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has 10 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 20d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 20d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 1,845 kg 4,068 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,985 kg 4,376 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 9.0 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 and Jaguar F-Pace 20d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 1,017 km 632 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 180 hp 134 kW | 9.0 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.8 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace20d |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace20d | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-Pace20d | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.0 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,845 kg 4,068 lb | 1,985 kg 4,376 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,017 km 632 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 155 g/km | 145 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace 20d | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace 20d
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 17 km (11 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 10 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























