Car comparison

Jaguar F-Pace 20dvsMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar F-Pace

20d

180 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2020
VS

Mazda CX-30

2.0 Skyactiv-X

180 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2019-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.9 s
  • Lightest
    1,538 kg
    3,391 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    117 hp/t
    87 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    111 g/km
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Jaguar F-Pace 20d

  • Fastest top speed
    208 km/h
    129 mph
  • Most powerful
    180 hp
    134 kW
  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    1,017 km
    632 mi
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    44/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarF-Pace20dMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180hp134kW
180hp134kW
Torque
430Nm317lb-ft
224Nm165lb-ft
Curb weight
1,845kg4,068lb
1,538kg3,391lb
Gross weight
2,460kg5,423lb
2,042kg4,502lb
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
103.0s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph
Calculated
80.9s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
9.0s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
66.8s
Calculated
67.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.5s
Calculated
8.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.5s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
98hp/t73kW/t44hp/1000 lb
Calculated
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton
Calculated
146Nm/t97lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,017km632mi
Calculated
980km609mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,731mm186in
4,395mm173in
Width
2,071mm82in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,666mm66in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,641mm65in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,654mm65in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance
215mm8in
175mm7in
Trunk volume-
430L
Max trunk volume-
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
48L
CO2 emissions
155g/km
111g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar F-Pace 20dMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-XPowerTorque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 20d: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarF-Pace20d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X6,000 rpm3,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarF-Pace20dMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.5 s
8.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
9.0 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
66.8 s
67.5 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.5 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
136 km/h
85 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace20d
180 hp
134 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace20d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
224 Nm
165 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace20d
1,845 kg
4,068 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
1,538 kg
3,391 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace20d
208 km/h
129 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace20d9.0 s
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X8.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X and Jaguar F-Pace 20d: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace20d
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X and Jaguar F-Pace 20d: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace20d
98 hp/t
73 kW/t
10.2 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace20d
1,017 km
632 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
980 km
609 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarF-Pace20d
180 hp
134 kW
9.0 s
208 km/h
129 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW
8.9 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarF-Pace20d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,666 mm
65.6 in
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarF-Pace20d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Jaguar F-Pace 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarF-Pace20d
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
9.0 s
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarF-Pace20d
98 hp/t
73 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarF-Pace20dMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
224 Nm
165 lb-ft
Acceleration
9.0 s
8.9 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,845 kg
4,068 lb
1,538 kg
3,391 lb
Fuel consumption
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,666 mm
65.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
1,017 km
632 mi
980 km
609 mi
CO2 score
155 g/km
111 g/km
Trunk score
-
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
98 hp/t
73 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar F-Pace 20dMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.33 LC100 km8.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.62 LC100 mi13.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used885 L234 US gal195 UK gal735 L194 US gal162 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,549 LC/year1,286 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar F-Pace 20d

  • Has 206 Nm more
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 37 km (23 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

  • Is 307 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 44 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar F-Pace 20d
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

20d
2.0d
VS
JaguarF-Pace20dvsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
20d
2.0 P200
VS
JaguarF-Pace20dvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
2.0 Skyactiv-X
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
20d
2.0i
VS
JaguarF-Pace20dvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
20d
2.0 D4
VS
JaguarF-Pace20dvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-32.0i
20d
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
JaguarF-Pace20dvsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 Skyactiv-X
330TSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
2.0 Skyactiv-X
20d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsJaguarF-Pace20d
20d
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarF-Pace20dvsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
Jaguar F-Pace 20d vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X - car comparison - FastVsFaster