Skoda Karoq
Car comparison
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSIvsVolvo XC40 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC40
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed213 km/h132 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,709 kg3,768 lb
- Best power-to-weight111 hp/t83 kW/t9.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk521 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Volvo XC40 2.0 D4
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions133 g/km
- Best estimated range1,059 km658 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | VolvoXC402.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,709kg3,768lb | 1,728kg3,810lb |
| Gross weight | 2,213kg4,879lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.4s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated | 84.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 42.7s Calculated | 51.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 797km495mi Calculated | 1,059km658mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,382mm173in | 4,425mm174in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,863mm73in |
| Height | 1,603mm63in | 1,652mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,638mm104in | 2,702mm106in |
| Front track | 1,576mm62in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,541mm61in | 1,626mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 167mm7in | 211mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 521L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,630L | 1,336L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 54L |
| CO2 emissions | 156g/km | 133g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC40 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | VolvoXC402.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 42.7 s | 51.2 s |
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 1,709 kg 3,768 lb |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 1,728 kg 3,810 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI and Volvo XC40 2.0 D4: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 D4 and Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 797 km 495 mi |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 1,059 km 658 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.3 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC40 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 D4 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | VolvoXC402.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,709 kg 3,768 lb | 1,728 kg 3,810 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 797 km 495 mi | 1,059 km 658 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 156 g/km | 133 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 521 L 18.4 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI | Volvo XC40 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI
- Is 19 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 61 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC40 2.0 D4
- Has 80 Nm more
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 262 km (163 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 23 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























