Car comparison

Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSIvsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Karoq

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2021
VS

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)

2.2 JTDM

190 hp2143 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM

  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    951 km
    591 mi
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    213 km/h
    132 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Lightest
    1,709 kg
    3,768 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    111 hp/t
    83 kW/t
    9.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    156 g/km

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaKaroq2.0 TSIAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,709kg3,768lb
1,745kg3,847lb
Gross weight
2,213kg4,879lb
-
Top speed
213 km/h
132 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
77.4s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph
Calculated
80.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
42.7s
Calculated
48.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton
Calculated
258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
797km495mi
Calculated
951km591mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
2,143cc131cu in
Length
4,382mm173in
4,686mm184in
Width
1,841mm72in
1,903mm75in
Height
1,603mm63in
1,693mm67in
Wheelbase
2,638mm104in
2,818mm111in
Front track
1,576mm62in
-
Rear track
1,541mm61in
-
Ground clearance
167mm7in
-
Trunk volume
521L
-
Max trunk volume
1,630L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
58L
CO2 emissions
156g/km
160g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSIAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDMPowerTorque
  • Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM3,500 rpm1,750 rpm3,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaKaroq2.0 TSIAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
42.7 s
48.8 s
Top speed
213 km/h
132 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
145 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI
1,709 kg
3,768 lb
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
1,745 kg
3,847 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI
213 km/h
132 mph
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI7.3 s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM7.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM and Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI
797 km
495 mi
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
951 km
591 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.3 s
213 km/h
132 mph
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
213 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
521 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,382 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,603 mm
63.1 in
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
213 km/h
132 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.3 s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaKaroq2.0 TSIAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
7.6 s
Top speed
213 km/h
132 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,709 kg
3,768 lb
1,745 kg
3,847 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
521 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,382 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,603 mm
63.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in
Range score
797 km
495 mi
951 km
591 mi
CO2 score
156 g/km
160 g/km
Trunk score
521 L
18.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Karoq 2.0 TSIAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km10.67 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi17.18 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal915 L242 US gal201 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year1,601 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI

  • Is 36 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 4 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM

  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 154 km (96 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.2 JTDM
VS
SkodaKaroq2.0 TSIvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
2.2 JTDM
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKaroq2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
2.2 JTDM
1.5 VGT
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsAlfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaKaroq2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
2.2 JTDM
2.0 TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
20d
VS
SkodaKaroq2.0 TSIvsBMWX2 (F39)20d
2.0 TSI
GLB 220d
VS
SkodaKaroq2.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d
2.2 JTDM
330TSI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
2.0 TSI
40 TFSI
VS
SkodaKaroq2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
2.2 JTDM
2.0 D4
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsVolvoXC402.0 D4
2.2 JTDM
1.5 VGT
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsAlfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM - car comparison - FastVsFaster