BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 20dvsSkoda Karoq 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Karoq
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 20d
- Fastest top speed221 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,063 km660 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score94/100
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Largest trunk521 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)20d | SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,709kg3,768lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 2,213kg4,879lb |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.0s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated | 77.4s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.7s Calculated | 42.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,063km660mi Calculated | 797km495mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,382mm173in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,603mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,638mm104in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,576mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,541mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | 167mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 521L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,630L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 156g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 20d: Power / Torque
- Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)20d | SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.7 s | 42.7 s |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 1,709 kg 3,768 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 213 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 7.7 s |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI and BMW X2 (F39) 20d: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20d and Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 1,063 km 660 mi |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 797 km 495 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.3 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)20d | SkodaKaroq2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,709 kg 3,768 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,063 km 660 mi | 797 km 495 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 156 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 521 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 20d | Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 20d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 109 kg lighter
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 265 km (165 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TSI
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 51 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























