Seat Tarraco
Car comparison
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Largest trunk760 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Lightest1,601 kg3,530 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t88 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range866 km538 mi
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,705kg3,759lb | 1,601kg3,530lb |
| Gross weight | 2,380kg5,247lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 72.6s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.4s Calculated | 39.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 857km533mi Calculated | 866km538mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,735mm186in | 4,509mm178in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,674mm66in | 1,684mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,790mm110in | 2,679mm105in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,564mm62in | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 192mm8in | 201mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 760L | 615L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,655L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 183g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 3,600-4,100 rpm | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 4,350 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.4 s | 39.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,601 kg 3,530 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 214 km/h 133 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 7.8 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.4 s |
Although Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI has more power, Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 857 km 533 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 866 km 538 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb | 1,601 kg 3,530 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 857 km 533 mi | 866 km 538 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 183 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 760 L 26.8 cu ft | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI | Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 145 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Is 104 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 9 km (5 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























