Seat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Seat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDIvsVolvo V90 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V90
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,380 kg3,042 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions117 g/km
- Best estimated range1,222 km759 mi
- Largest trunk587 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Volvo V90 2.0 T4
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | VolvoV902.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,380kg3,042lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | - |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.4s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 86.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.9s Calculated | 41.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated | 161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,222km759mi Calculated | 797km495mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,549mm179in | 4,936mm194in |
| Width | 1,816mm71in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,636mm104in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,549mm61in | 1,928mm76in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 153mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 587L | 560L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,470L | 1,526L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 117g/km | 160g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volvo V90 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,620-4,020 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | VolvoV902.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.9 s | 41.6 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volvo V90 2.0 T4 has 6 hp more than Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and Volvo V90 2.0 T4: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 8.9 s |
Although Volvo V90 2.0 T4 has more power, Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and Volvo V90 2.0 T4: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and Volvo V90 2.0 T4: 2.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,222 km 759 mi |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 797 km 495 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.9 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV902.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV902.0 T4 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | VolvoV902.0 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | 1,860 kg 4,101 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,222 km 759 mi | 797 km 495 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 117 g/km | 160 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI | Volvo V90 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 480 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 425 km (264 mi) more estimated range
- Has 27 L more trunk volume
- Emits 43 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo V90 2.0 T4
- Has 6 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























