Car comparison

Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIvsVolvo V70 III 3.2

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011

2.0 TSI

211 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2011-2012
VS

Volvo V70 III

3.2

243 hp3192 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2011-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    239 km/h
    149 mph
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,490 kg
    3,285 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    162 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,000 km
    621 mi
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Volvo V70 III 3.2

  • Most powerful
    243 hp
    181 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    155 hp/t
    116 kW/t
    6.4 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    575 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIVolvoV70 III3.2
Power
211hp157kW
243hp181kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,490kg3,285lb
1,567kg3,455lb
Gross weight
2,050kg4,519lb
2,180kg4,806lb
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
71.4s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph
Calculated
83.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
8.4s
0-200 km/h
26.4s
Calculated
32.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,000km621mi
Calculated
761km473mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
3,192cc195cu in
Length
4,666mm184in
4,823mm190in
Width
1,772mm70in
1,907mm75in
Height
1,454mm57in
1,547mm61in
Wheelbase
2,642mm104in
2,816mm111in
Front track
1,522mm60in
1,588mm63in
Rear track
1,523mm60in
1,586mm62in
Ground clearance-
151mm6in
Trunk volume
422L
575L
Max trunk volume
1,354L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
70L
CO2 emissions
162g/km
214g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIVolvo V70 III 3.2PowerTorque
  • Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volvo V70 III 3.2: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI4,600-6,000 rpm1,500-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
VolvoV70 III3.26,400 rpm3,180 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIVolvoV70 III3.2
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
8.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.4 s
32.0 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
VolvoV70 III3.2
243 hp
181 kW

Volvo V70 III 3.2 has 32 hp more than Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volvo V70 III 3.2: 32 hp (24 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
VolvoV70 III3.2
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
VolvoV70 III3.2
1,567 kg
3,455 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
239 km/h
149 mph
VolvoV70 III3.2
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI7.3 s
VolvoV70 III3.28.4 s

Although Volvo V70 III 3.2 has more power, Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volvo V70 III 3.2: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
VolvoV70 III3.2
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volvo V70 III 3.2: 2.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
VolvoV70 III3.2
155 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,000 km
621 mi
VolvoV70 III3.2
761 km
473 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
7.3 s
239 km/h
149 mph
VolvoV70 III3.2
243 hp
181 kW
8.4 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
VolvoV70 III3.2
Power
243 hp
181 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
4,823 mm
189.9 in
Height
1,547 mm
60.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
VolvoV70 III3.2
Power
243 hp
181 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
7.3 s
VolvoV70 III3.2
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
8.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
VolvoV70 III3.2
155 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIVolvoV70 III3.2
Power
211 hp
157 kW
243 hp
181 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
8.4 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
1,567 kg
3,455 lb
Fuel consumption
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
4,823 mm
189.9 in
Height
1,547 mm
60.9 in
Range score
1,000 km
621 mi
761 km
473 mi
CO2 score
162 g/km
214 g/km
Trunk score
422 L
14.9 cu ft
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
155 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSeat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIVolvo V70 III 3.2
Consumption7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.25 LC100 km16.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.71 LC100 mi25.91 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,838 LC/year2,415 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Is 77 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 239 km (149 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 52 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Volvo V70 III 3.2

  • Has 32 hp more
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 153 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
Volvo V70 III 3.2
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
3.2
2.4i 20V T5
VS
VolvoV70 III3.2vsVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
3.2
R 2.5i V20
VS
VolvoV70 III3.2vsVolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo2.0 TSI
3.2
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoV70 III3.2vsVolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI
3.2
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoV70 III3.2vsVolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
2.0 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI
3.2
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoV70 III3.2vsVolvoV902.0 T5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
3.2
3.0 T6
VS
VolvoV70 III3.2vsVolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI vs Volvo V70 III 3.2 - car comparison - FastVsFaster