Volvo V70 III
Car comparison
Volvo V70 III 3.2vsVolvo XC70 II 3.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC70 II
3.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Most powerful285 hp213 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volvo V70 III 3.2
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Lightest1,567 kg3,455 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions214 g/km
- Best estimated range761 km473 mi
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV70 III3.2 | VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 243hp181kW | 285hp213kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,567kg3,455lb | 1,769kg3,900lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 83.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 69.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.0s Calculated | 34.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 761km473mi Calculated | 609km378mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,192cc195cu in | 2,953cc180cu in |
| Length | 4,823mm190in | 4,838mm190in |
| Width | 1,907mm75in | 1,861mm73in |
| Height | 1,547mm61in | 1,604mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,816mm111in | 2,815mm111in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,614mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,586mm62in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 151mm6in | 210mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 575L | 575L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 214g/km | 269g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V70 III 3.2: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 6,400 rpm | 3,180 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 5,950 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 6,200 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV70 III3.2 | VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.0 s | 34.0 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 243 hp 181 kW |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 285 hp 213 kW |
Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 has 42 hp more than Volvo V70 III 3.2.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V70 III 3.2 and Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6: 42 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 1,769 kg 3,900 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 8.4 s |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 and Volvo V70 III 3.2: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V70 III 3.2 and Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 761 km 473 mi |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 609 km 378 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 243 hp 181 kW | 8.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 285 hp 213 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV70 III3.2 | VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 243 hp 181 kW | 285 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb | 1,769 kg 3,900 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 761 km 473 mi | 609 km 378 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 214 g/km | 269 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V70 III 3.2 | Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V70 III 3.2
- Is 202 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 152 km (95 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 55 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6
- Has 42 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























