Car comparison

Volvo V70 III 3.2vsSeat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo V70 III

3.2

243 hp3192 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2011-2013
VS

Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011

2.0 TSI

211 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2011-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Lightest
    1,490 kg
    3,285 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    142 hp/t
    106 kW/t
    7.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    162 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,000 km
    621 mi
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Volvo V70 III 3.2

  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    243 hp
    181 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    575 L
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoV70 III3.2SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
243hp181kW
211hp157kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,806kg3,982lb
1,490kg3,285lb
Gross weight
2,410kg5,313lb
2,050kg4,519lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
239 km/h
149 mph
To 99% top speed
89.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
71.5s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.6s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
31.9s
Calculated
26.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.2s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
722km448mi
Calculated
1,000km621mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,192cc195cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,823mm190in
4,666mm184in
Width-
1,772mm70in
Height
1,547mm61in
1,454mm57in
Wheelbase
2,816mm111in
2,642mm104in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,522mm60in
Rear track
1,586mm62in
1,523mm60in
Ground clearance
151mm6in
-
Trunk volume
575L
422L
Max trunk volume-
1,354L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
70L
CO2 emissions
224g/km
162g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo V70 III 3.2Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Volvo V70 III 3.2: Power / Torque
  • Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoV70 III3.26,400 rpm3,180 rpm6,650 rpm
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI4,600-6,000 rpm1,500-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoV70 III3.2SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.2 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.6 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.9 s
26.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
239 km/h
149 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.9 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.3 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.8 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV70 III3.2
243 hp
181 kW
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW

Volvo V70 III 3.2 has 32 hp more than Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volvo V70 III 3.2: 32 hp (24 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV70 III3.2
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV70 III3.2
1,806 kg
3,982 lb
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,490 kg
3,285 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV70 III3.2
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
239 km/h
149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV70 III3.28.6 s
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI7.3 s

Although Volvo V70 III 3.2 has more power, Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volvo V70 III 3.2: 1.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV70 III3.2
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volvo V70 III 3.2: 2.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV70 III3.2
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV70 III3.2
722 km
448 mi
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,000 km
621 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoV70 III3.2
243 hp
181 kW
8.6 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
7.3 s
239 km/h
149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoV70 III3.2
Power
243 hp
181 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
4,823 mm
189.9 in
Height
1,547 mm
60.9 in
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoV70 III3.2
Power
243 hp
181 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoV70 III3.2
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
8.6 s
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoV70 III3.2
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoV70 III3.2SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
243 hp
181 kW
211 hp
157 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.6 s
7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
239 km/h
149 mph
Lightness
1,806 kg
3,982 lb
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
Fuel consumption
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
4,823 mm
189.9 in
Height
1,547 mm
60.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Range score
722 km
448 mi
1,000 km
621 mi
CO2 score
224 g/km
162 g/km
Trunk score
575 L
20.3 cu ft
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo V70 III 3.2Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
Consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.97 LC100 km12.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.32 LC100 mi19.71 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,546 LC/year1,838 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo V70 III 3.2

  • Has 32 hp more
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 153 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Is 316 kg lighter
  • Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 278 km (173 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 62 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo V70 III 3.2
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.2
2.4i 20V T5
VS
VolvoV70 III3.2vsVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
3.2
R 2.5i V20
VS
VolvoV70 III3.2vsVolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
3.2
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoV70 III3.2vsVolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo2.0 TSI
3.2
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoV70 III3.2vsVolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI
3.2
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoV70 III3.2vsVolvoV902.0 T5
2.0 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI
3.2
3.0 T6
VS
VolvoV70 III3.2vsVolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
Volvo V70 III 3.2 vs Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster