Volvo V70 III
Car comparison
Volvo V70 III 3.2vsVolvo V50 · Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V50 · Facelift 2007
2.5 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V70 III 3.2
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful243 hp181 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions224 g/km
- Best estimated range722 km448 mi
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Lightest1,492 kg3,289 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV70 III3.2 | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 243hp181kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,806kg3,982lb | 1,492kg3,289lb |
| Gross weight | 2,410kg5,313lb | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 89.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 71.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.9s Calculated | 28.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 722km448mi Calculated | 574km357mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,192cc195cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,823mm190in | 4,522mm178in |
| Width | - | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,547mm61in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,816mm111in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,586mm62in | 1,531mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 151mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 575L | 417L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,307L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 224g/km | 241g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V70 III 3.2: Power / Torque
- Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 6,400 rpm | 3,180 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV70 III3.2 | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.9 s | 28.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 243 hp 181 kW |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW |
Volvo V70 III 3.2 has 13 hp more than Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 and Volvo V70 III 3.2: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 1,806 kg 3,982 lb |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 1,492 kg 3,289 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 8.6 s |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 7.6 s |
Although Volvo V70 III 3.2 has more power, Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 and Volvo V70 III 3.2: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 722 km 448 mi |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 574 km 357 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 243 hp 181 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III3.2 | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV70 III3.2 | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 243 hp 181 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,806 kg 3,982 lb | 1,492 kg 3,289 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 722 km 448 mi | 574 km 357 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 224 g/km | 241 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | 417 L 14.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V70 III 3.2 | Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V70 III 3.2
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 147 km (92 mi) more estimated range
- Has 158 L more trunk volume
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Is 314 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























